Xiaomi Poco C40 vs TCL 50 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 50 SE
TCL 50 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 102.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 204 g 195 g
Height 169.6 mm 168.2 mm
Width 76.6 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Space Gray
  • Midnight Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 21:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 86 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits 550 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 108.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 48.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5010 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco C40 vs. TCL 50 SE: A Budget Battle Royale

Hello, fellow tech explorers! Alex Griffin here, ready to dissect the Xiaomi Poco C40 and the TCL 50 SE. These two contenders are vying for your attention in the budget-friendly arena, and we're going to delve deep to see which one comes out on top. Forget marketing fluff – we're talking real-world performance, practical benefits, and helping you choose the perfect phone for your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown:

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40TCL 50 SEReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2168.2 x 75.5 x 8.1TCL 50 SE is slightly thinner and lighter
Weight (g)204195TCL 50 SE is noticeably less bulky in hand
Display
Size (inches)6.716.78Negligible difference in screen real estate
Resolution (px)720 x 16501080 x 2460TCL 50 SE boasts significantly sharper visuals (Full HD+)
Refresh Rate (Hz)6090TCL 50 SE offers smoother scrolling and animations
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer good color reproduction but limited viewing angles in bright sunlight
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510Mediatek Helio G88TCL 50 SE has a more powerful and efficient processor
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core 2.0 GHzWhile clock speeds are similar, the Helio G88's architecture provides a performance edge
RAM (GB)46More RAM in the TCL 50 SE enables better multitasking and app handling
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1350TCL 50 SE offers vastly improved image quality and detail
Selfie Camera (MP)58TCL 50 SE likely produces better selfies
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)60005010Poco C40 has a larger battery, potentially longer lasting but slower charging with 18W vs 33W on TCL 50 SE

2. Key Insights:

The Poco C40 prioritizes battery life above all else. That massive 6000mAh battery will easily power you through a full day, maybe even two. However, it compromises on performance and display quality. The JLQ JR510 chipset is entry-level, and the 720p display, while large, lacks sharpness.

The TCL 50 SE strikes a more balanced approach. While its 5010mAh battery is smaller, the Helio G88 chipset offers a noticeable performance boost for everyday tasks and light gaming. The Full HD+ display is a significant upgrade, delivering crisper images and text. The faster 90Hz refresh rate adds a touch of premium feel with smoother interactions. Moreover, the TCL 50 SE packs a significantly better camera system, especially the 50MP main sensor.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations:

Poco C40: Ideal for users who prioritize battery life above all else and primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media browsing. Think students, seniors, or anyone who needs a reliable communication device that lasts for days on a single charge.

TCL 50 SE: Suitable for users who want a well-rounded experience with decent performance, a good display, and a capable camera without breaking the bank. This phone caters to those who enjoy multimedia consumption, light gaming, and capturing everyday moments.

4. Buying Decision Framework:

  1. What's your budget? The Poco C40 is significantly cheaper, making it a true budget king. The TCL 50 SE commands a higher price, reflecting its upgraded features.
  2. What's your primary phone usage? Heavy reliance on basic communication? Poco C40. More demanding tasks and multimedia consumption? TCL 50 SE.
  3. What features matter most? Battery life above all else? Poco C40. A balance of performance, display, and camera? TCL 50 SE.

My Choice: TCL 50 SE

While the Poco C40's battery life is tempting, I value a well-rounded experience. The TCL 50 SE's superior display, faster processor, smoother refresh rate, and drastically better camera system make it a clear winner for me. The slightly higher price is a worthwhile investment for the significant jump in overall quality and usability. It offers a more future-proof package and a more enjoyable everyday experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.