Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Samsung Galaxy A04e - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 November 7, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 204 g 188 g
Height 169.6 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.6 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco C40 vs. Samsung Galaxy A04e: A Deep Dive for the Budget-Conscious Buyer

Hello, fellow tech explorers! Today, we're diving into the world of budget smartphones, dissecting the Xiaomi Poco C40 and the Samsung Galaxy A04e. Both devices promise impressive features at an affordable price, but which one reigns supreme? Let's break it down with a detailed comparison, focusing on what these specs mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40Samsung Galaxy A04eReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1Poco C40 slightly larger, may feel less comfortable in smaller hands.
Weight (g)204188Poco C40 noticeably heavier, potentially impacting one-handed use.
Display
Size (inches)6.716.5Poco C40 offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1650720 x 1600Negligible difference in sharpness; both are adequate for everyday use.
TypeIPS LCDPLS LCDSimilar display technology; expect decent color reproduction and viewing angles, but not as vibrant as AMOLED.
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510Mediatek Helio P35Poco C40's JR510 is a relatively newer, potentially more power-efficient chip, but real-world performance comparisons are crucial.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Clock speeds suggest A04e might offer a slight performance edge in certain tasks, though architecture differences (Cortex-A55 vs. A53) complicate direct comparison.
GPUMali-G57 MC1PowerVR GE8320GPU performance differences likely noticeable in gaming and graphically demanding applications. Mali-G57 generally considered more powerful.
RAM (GB)43(in this comparison)More RAM in the Poco C40 enables better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP + 2MP13MP + 2MPSimilar primary camera resolutions, but sensor quality and software processing will significantly impact image quality - this data is missing.
Selfie Camera5MP5MPIdentical resolution; expect basic selfie quality from both.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)60005000Poco C40 boasts a significantly larger battery, potentially translating to much longer usage time.
Fast Charging18WN/APoco C40 supports fast charging, enabling quicker top-ups and minimizing downtime. A significant advantage.

2. Key Insights

The Poco C40 stands out with its massive 6000mAh battery and 18W fast charging. This translates to potentially two days of moderate use on a single charge and quick replenishment when needed. The larger display also provides a more immersive experience for media consumption. However, its weight and size might be a concern for some.

The Galaxy A04e is lighter and more compact, making it comfortable for one-handed use. While it has a smaller battery, Samsung's One UI is generally known for its optimization, potentially mitigating some of the capacity difference. The A04e is running a newer version of Android (12) compared to the Poco C40 (11).

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Poco C40: Ideal for users who prioritize battery life and a large screen for media consumption, gaming, or extended use without frequent charging. Students, on-the-go professionals, and heavy media consumers would find this appealing.

Galaxy A04e: Suited for users who value a compact and lightweight phone for comfortable one-handed operation. Those who primarily use their phones for calling, texting, social media, and light browsing, and who are okay with more frequent charging, would find this a decent option.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Ask Yourself:

  1. How important is battery life? If all-day (or multi-day) battery is paramount, the Poco C40 is the clear winner.
  2. Do you prefer a large screen or a compact phone? The Poco C40's 6.71-inch display offers more screen real estate, while the A04e is more pocketable.
  3. What's your budget and usage pattern? Both phones are budget-friendly, but consider how much you value features like fast charging and a larger screen relative to their price difference.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two, I'd lean towards the Xiaomi Poco C40. The combination of the significantly larger battery, faster charging, and larger display is compelling. While the added weight might be a minor inconvenience, the benefits of extended battery life and a more immersive visual experience outweigh it for me personally. I tend to heavily use my phone throughout the day, relying on it for navigation, photography, and occasional gaming, making battery life a crucial factor. The Poco C40's endurance aligns better with my usage pattern. While the A04e offers a more modern version of Android and a potentially more powerful CPU, the lack of concrete camera sensor information and significantly smaller battery (without fast charging) make it a less attractive option for me. I'd prioritize real-world usability and longevity.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.