Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Realme C61 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C61
Realme C61
Realme

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 July 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 100.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 204 g 188 g
Height 169.6 mm 167.3 mm
Width 76.6 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Dark Green
  • Sparkle Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 560 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 49.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Poco C40 and the Realme C61, two contenders in the budget smartphone arena. We'll dissect their specifications, translate them into real-world implications, and ultimately help you decide which phone might be your perfect fit.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40Realme C61Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2167.3 x 76.7 x 7.8C61 is slightly more compact and thinner.
Weight (g)204188C61 feels noticeably lighter in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.716.74Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)720 x 1650720 x 1600Both offer similar HD+ resolution; C40 slightly taller aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate (Hz)-90C61's 90Hz provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDExpect vibrant colors but limited viewing angles on both.
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510 (11 nm)Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)C61 likely offers better overall performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz A55 & 4x1.5 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)C61's A75 cores provide a performance advantage for demanding tasks.
RAM4GB/3GB6GB/4GBC61 offers more RAM for smoother multitasking.
OSAndroid 11Android 14C61 ships with a more modern OS, potentially longer software support.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP + 2MP Depth32MP + 2MP DepthC61 boasts higher resolution main sensor, potentially better image quality in daylight.
Front Camera5MP5MPSelfie camera performance should be comparable.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)60005000C40 has significantly larger battery, expect longer usage time.
Charging18W45WC61 charges dramatically faster.
Other
NFCYesNoC40 supports contactless payments.
PriceLowerHigherC40 generally more affordable.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While both phones cater to basic tasks, the Realme C61, with its Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset, more RAM, and faster refresh rate display, will likely offer a smoother user experience, especially for multitasking and light gaming. The Poco C40's JLQ JR510 is primarily focused on efficiency.
  • Battery: The Poco C40's massive 6000mAh battery is the clear winner in longevity. However, the C61's 45W fast charging significantly reduces downtime, a crucial advantage for busy users.
  • Camera: The Realme C61's 32MP main camera should theoretically deliver more detailed photos in good lighting conditions. However, real-world performance depends on image processing, which isn't fully captured in specs.
  • Software: The C61's advantage of shipping with Android 14 is substantial. It ensures a more modern user interface, better optimization, and potentially longer software updates and security patches.
  • Value: The Poco C40 prioritizes battery life and affordability above all else. The C61 offers a more well-rounded package with better performance, faster charging, and a more modern OS, at a slightly higher price point.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco C40: Ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize battery life above all else. Students, casual users, and those who primarily use their phones for communication and basic tasks would find the C40 sufficient.
  • Realme C61: Best suited for users who want a more responsive and modern smartphone experience without breaking the bank. Its faster refresh rate, improved performance, and faster charging make it a good choice for light gaming, social media, and content consumption.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? If price is the primary concern, the Poco C40 is the more affordable option.
  2. What's your primary phone usage? For basic communication and long battery life, the C40 suffices. If you need smoother performance for gaming or multitasking, the C61 is better.
  3. How important is fast charging? If you need your phone charged quickly, the C61's 45W charging is a game-changer.

My Choice: Realme C61

While the Poco C40's battery life is tempting, as a tech journalist, I value a smooth and responsive user experience. The Realme C61's superior performance, thanks to its better processor and increased RAM, combined with the significantly faster charging and more up-to-date Android version, makes it the more compelling device for me. The trade-off of a slightly smaller battery is acceptable considering the significant gains in usability and future-proofing offered by the C61. While NFC would be nice, I personally rely more on mobile payment systems that don't require it. The price difference is modest enough that the overall value proposition of the C61 wins out.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.