Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Motorola Moto G72 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 October 3, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 94.34 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.98 "/g
Weight 204 g 166 g
Height 169.6 mm 160.5 mm
Width 76.6 mm 74.4 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Polar Blue
  • Mineral White

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 88.1 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco C40 vs. Motorola Moto G72: A Deep Dive for the Discerning Smartphone Buyer

Let's cut through the marketing fluff and get down to brass tacks. We're pitting the Xiaomi Poco C40 against the Motorola Moto G72, two phones vying for your attention in the budget-conscious arena. As a tech journalist with an engineering background, I'll break down the specs, translate them into real-world experiences, and help you decide which phone fits your lifestyle.

1. Specifications Breakdown:

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40Motorola Moto G72Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9Moto G72 is noticeably slimmer and lighter, enhancing one-handed use.
Weight (g)204166Poco C40's heft might be tiring during extended use.
Display
TypeIPS LCDP-OLEDMoto G72 boasts richer colors, deeper blacks, and potentially better battery efficiency due to the P-OLED technology.
Size (inches)6.716.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 16501080 x 2400Moto G72 offers significantly sharper visuals for media consumption and gaming.
Refresh Rate (Hz)N/A120Moto G72's higher refresh rate translates to smoother scrolling and animations, a more fluid user experience.
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510 (11 nm)Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Moto G72's more advanced processor and smaller fabrication node promise significantly faster performance and better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core 2.2 GHzMoto G72's higher clock speed contributes to quicker app loading and multitasking.
RAM4GB8GBMoto G72's double the RAM ensures smoother multitasking and less aggressive app closure in the background.
Camera
Main Camera13MP108MPMoto G72's higher resolution sensor potentially captures more detail, though megapixel count isn't everything. Real-world image quality depends on processing and lens quality.
Selfie Camera5MP16MPMoto G72 likely produces better quality selfies with more detail.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)60005000Poco C40's larger battery capacity suggests longer endurance, but actual battery life is influenced by many factors, including screen type and processor efficiency.

2. Key Insights:

The Moto G72 emerges as the clear winner in terms of overall performance and display quality. Its P-OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate offers a vastly superior visual experience compared to the Poco C40's LCD. The Helio G99 chipset coupled with 8GB of RAM will deliver a noticeably smoother and more responsive user experience, especially for demanding tasks like gaming.

The Poco C40's main advantage lies in its massive 6000mAh battery. While the Moto G72 is likely more power-efficient overall, the sheer size of the Poco C40's battery could translate to longer uptime for users who prioritize endurance over raw performance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations:

  • Poco C40: Best suited for users on a tight budget who prioritize battery life above all else. Think students, casual users, or those who primarily use their phones for calling, texting, and light browsing.

  • Moto G72: Ideal for users who value a smooth, responsive experience and a vibrant display. This phone caters to gamers, multimedia enthusiasts, and those who engage in more demanding tasks on their smartphones.

4. Buying Decision Framework:

  • What is your budget? The Poco C40 is significantly cheaper, making it an attractive option for price-sensitive buyers.

  • What are your primary phone usage patterns? If battery life is paramount, the Poco C40 might be the better choice. If performance and display quality are more important, the Moto G72 is the clear winner.

  • How important is camera quality to you? While we lack detailed camera specs, the Moto G72's higher resolution sensors suggest a potential advantage in image quality. However, real-world testing would be needed to confirm this.

My Choice: The Motorola Moto G72

If I were choosing between these two, I'd go with the Moto G72. While the Poco C40's massive battery is tempting, I prioritize a fluid user experience and a vibrant display. The Moto G72's superior processor, ample RAM, and stunning P-OLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate are compelling features that significantly enhance daily usage. I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of battery capacity for the noticeable boost in performance and visual quality. The slimmer design and lighter weight are also significant factors for me, contributing to a more comfortable and enjoyable user experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.