Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Motorola Moto E13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 February 13, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 104.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 204 g 179.5 g
Height 169.6 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.6 mm 75 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 82.8 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 47.77 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Xiaomi Poco C40 and the Motorola Moto E13, two contenders in the budget smartphone arena. We'll dissect their specifications, translate them into real-world implications, and ultimately guide you toward the device that best fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40Motorola Moto E13Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2164.2 x 75 x 8.5Poco C40 is slightly larger and thicker. Moto E13 might feel more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)204179.5Moto E13 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.716.5Poco C40 offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1650720 x 1600Both have similar resolutions, resulting in comparable sharpness. Poco C40's slightly taller aspect ratio might be preferable.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDExpect decent color reproduction and viewing angles, but limited contrast and black levels compared to OLED displays.
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510Unisoc T606Moto E13's Unisoc T606 generally benchmarks higher, promising smoother multitasking and potentially better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHzOcta-core 1.6 GHzWhile Poco C40 has higher clock speeds, the Unisoc T606's architecture in the Moto E13 likely provides a performance advantage.
GPUMali-G57 MC1Mali-G57 MP1Both GPUs are entry-level, suitable for casual gaming but not demanding 3D titles.
RAM (GB)42/44GB RAM variant on both phones enables smoother multitasking. The 2GB RAM option on the Moto E13 could feel limiting.
OSAndroid 11Android 13Moto E13 benefits from newer OS features, security updates, and potential performance optimizations.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)13 + 213Poco C40 features a secondary depth sensor for portrait mode, while Moto E13 relies on software processing.
Front Camera (MP)55Both offer basic selfie cameras.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)60005000Poco C40's larger battery promises significantly longer usage time on a single charge.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While the Poco C40 boasts higher clock speeds, the Moto E13's Unisoc T606 chip and more recent Android version likely deliver a smoother overall experience.
  • Battery: The Poco C40's massive 6000mAh battery is a standout feature, offering significantly longer endurance.
  • Software: Moto E13 ships with Android 13, providing a more up-to-date software experience and potentially longer software support.
  • Display: Both displays are comparable in terms of sharpness, but the Poco C40 provides slightly more screen real estate.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco C40: Ideal for users prioritizing battery life above all else. Heavy media consumers and those in areas with limited charging access will appreciate the extended endurance.
  • Moto E13: Best suited for users who value a smoother software experience and slightly better performance for everyday tasks. Its lighter weight also makes it more pocketable.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? Both phones are budget-friendly, but the Moto E13 is potentially cheaper in some markets.
  2. How important is battery life? If all-day battery life is paramount, the Poco C40 is the clear winner.
  3. Do you prioritize performance or software updates? The Moto E13 offers a more modern Android experience and potentially better performance.

My Choice: I would personally choose the Motorola Moto E13. While the Poco C40's battery life is tempting, I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, which the Moto E13's more modern chipset and updated software are more likely to deliver. The lighter weight and sleeker design are also appealing. While battery life is important, I'd rather carry a power bank than compromise on performance and software in daily use. The difference in screen size is negligible for my needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.