Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Huawei Mate 50 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 17, 2022 September 28, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 119.52 cm³ 104.03 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.29 "/g
Weight 204 g 205 g
Height 169.6 mm 162.1 mm
Width 76.6 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Purple
  • Orange

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 1212 x 2616
Aspect Ratio 21:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 91.3 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 428 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 133.26 mAh/in² 103.46 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.2 mAh/cm³ 45.18 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset JLQ JR510 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC1 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android N/A
Initial OS Version 11 N/A
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco C40 vs. Huawei Mate 50 Pro: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Xiaomi Poco C40 and the Huawei Mate 50 Pro, two phones occupying vastly different ends of the smartphone spectrum. We'll break down their specs, analyze their real-world performance, and help you decide which one might be your perfect fit.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco C40Huawei Mate 50 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2 mm162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mmMate 50 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner, offering a more premium and pocketable feel.
Weight204g205gNegligible weight difference; both feel substantial in hand.
Build MaterialsPlasticGlass, MetalMate 50 Pro boasts a more premium build with enhanced durability and aesthetics.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDOLEDMate 50 Pro's OLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency.
Size6.71"6.74"Virtually identical screen sizes, providing ample viewing space.
Resolution720 x 16501212 x 2616Mate 50 Pro boasts significantly sharper visuals due to much higher resolution (428 ppi vs 268 ppi).
Refresh Rate-120HzMate 50 Pro's 120Hz display delivers smoother scrolling and animations for a more fluid experience.
Performance
ChipsetJLQ JR510Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Mate 50 Pro offers dramatically faster processing power for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core 2.0GHzOcta-core 3.19GHzMate 50 Pro's CPU delivers significantly improved performance and responsiveness.
RAM4GB8GBMate 50 Pro provides smoother multitasking and handles demanding applications with ease.
Camera
Main Camera13MP50MPMate 50 Pro offers a vastly superior camera system with higher resolution and advanced features.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@60fpsMate 50 Pro captures higher resolution video with smoother frame rates.
Battery Life
Capacity6000mAh4700mAhPoco C40 offers a larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer usage times.
Charging18W66WMate 50 Pro supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.
Price RangeLowMediumPoco C40 significantly more affordable; Mate 50 Pro positioned in the premium segment.

2. Key Insights

The Poco C40 prioritizes affordability and long battery life. Its large 6000mAh battery will easily last a full day, even with heavy use. However, it compromises on performance and display quality. The JLQ JR510 chipset is suitable for basic tasks, but struggles with demanding applications or gaming. The 720p display is noticeable less sharp.

The Mate 50 Pro is a flagship device offering top-tier performance, a stunning display, and a powerful camera system. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers blazing-fast speeds, the 120Hz OLED display is visually impressive, and the camera system captures stunning photos and videos. However, its battery life, while respectable, is not as enduring as the Poco C40's, and the price reflects its premium positioning. Importantly, it lacks Google Mobile Services, which could be a significant drawback for some users.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco C40: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and basic functionality: calling, texting, social media browsing, and light web browsing. A great option for a secondary phone or for users who are not demanding of high performance.

  • Mate 50 Pro: Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, a premium multimedia experience, and cutting-edge camera technology. Perfect for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts who are willing to invest in a flagship experience. However, the lack of Google services is a major consideration.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? If price is a primary concern, the Poco C40 is the clear winner.
  • What are your primary smartphone needs? For basic communication and light usage, the Poco C40 suffices. For demanding tasks and multimedia consumption, the Mate 50 Pro excels.
  • Are Google Mobile Services essential for you? If you rely heavily on Google's ecosystem (Gmail, YouTube, Google Maps), the lack of these services on the Mate 50 Pro is a dealbreaker. Consider this limitation carefully.

My Choice: Huawei Mate 50 Pro

While the lack of Google Mobile Services is a significant hurdle, I would choose the Huawei Mate 50 Pro. As a tech journalist, I need a device with top-tier performance to handle multitasking, content creation, and running various benchmarking applications. The Mate 50 Pro's superior processing power, stunning display, and advanced camera system are crucial for my workflow. I'm willing to adapt to alternative app stores and services to gain access to the raw power and premium experience this phone offers. While the Poco C40 is a commendable budget option, it simply doesn't meet my needs for performance and a high-quality display. I value a fluid and responsive user experience, and the Mate 50 Pro delivers in spades. Finally, I am confident in my ability to navigate the challenges presented by the lack of Google services.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.