1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 × 74.6 × 8.5 mm | 163.3 × 75.9 × 8.9 mm | Mi 11 Pro is slightly taller, narrower and thinner; Poco X3 GT is a bit wider and thicker. Mi 11 Pro slightly more compact. |
| Weight | 208g | 193g | Poco X3 GT is 15g lighter, making it more comfortable for extended one-handed use. |
Display
| Feature | Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.81" | 6.6" | Mi 11 Pro offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption. |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 | 1080x2400 | Mi 11 Pro has a significantly sharper display, resulting in crisper text and images, especially noticeable when reading small text or viewing photos. |
| Pixel Density | 515 PPI | 399 PPI | Mi 11 Pro's higher PPI translates to a noticeably clearer and more detailed visual experience. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Mi 11 Pro's AMOLED screen offers deeper blacks, higher contrast, more vibrant colors, and better viewing angles. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer a smooth 120Hz refresh rate for fluid scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | 1700 nits | 0 nits | Mi 11 Pro has a significantly brighter screen, much more usable under direct sunlight. X3 GT's brightness data is missing. |
Performance
| Feature | Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Mi 11 Pro's Snapdragon 888 offers better overall performance in demanding tasks and gaming. Poco X3 GT's Dimensity 1100 is still powerful for most users. |
| AnTuTu Score | 854,267 | 745,283 | Mi 11 Pro achieves better benchmark scores, suggesting potentially smoother performance in intensive applications and games. |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mi 11 Pro's Adreno 660 provides slightly better graphics performance in games, but both are capable for most mobile gaming needs. |
Camera
| Feature | Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Camera | 50MP f/1.95, 1/1.12" sensor, 1.40µm pixels (Samsung GN2) | 64MP f/1.79, 1/2" sensor, 0.70µm pixels (Omnivision OV64B) | Mi 11 Pro's larger sensor size allows better low-light performance despite lower MP count, while Poco X3 GT offers more detail in good light conditions. |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP f/2.3, 1/3.4" sensor, 0.80µm pixels (Samsung S5K3T2) | 16MP f/2.45, pixel size unspecified | Mi 11 Pro takes sharper selfies with more details, better low-light, and wider aperture. Poco X3 GT pixel size unspecified so it may vary. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 13MP f/2.2, 1/3.06" sensor, 1.12µm pixels (Omnivision OV13B10) | Not available | Mi 11 Pro offers a versatile wide-angle option for landscape shots; Poco X3 GT lacks this feature. |
| Telephoto/Macro Lens | 8MP, 1/4.4" sensor, 1.00µm pixels (Omnivision OV08A10) | Not available | Mi 11 Pro offers telephoto zoom and macro capabilities; Poco X3 GT lacks this feature, requiring digital zoom. |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps, EIS, HDR, Slow-motion: 1920 fps | 4K@30fps, Slow-motion: 960 fps | Mi 11 Pro offers higher resolution and frame rate for video recording and better stabilization. |
| DXOMark | Main: 124, Photo: 118, Video: 132 | Not available | Mi 11 Pro has been tested by DxOMark and has proven great photo and video quality. |
Battery
| Feature | Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both have similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life under normal usage. |
| Charging | 67W fast charging, 67W wireless, 10W reverse-wireless | 67W fast charging | Both offer fast wired charging, but Mi 11 Pro offers faster charging with added wireless and reverse charging capabilities. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Advantages:
- Superior Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED panel, and significantly higher brightness make for a much better viewing experience.
- Better Camera System: Larger main sensor, telephoto/macro lens, and 8K video recording offer more versatility and higher quality images and videos.
- More Powerful Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset provides a performance edge for demanding tasks and gaming.
- Faster Wireless Charging: Includes 67W wireless charging capabilities and 10W reverse wireless charging, lacking in the Poco X3 GT.
- Better Audio Recording 3 microphones compared to 2 in the X3 GT.
- More Accurate Location: Supports more GPS systems and provides greater location accuracy.
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT Advantages:
- Lighter: 15g lighter makes it more comfortable to handle and carry for extended periods.
- Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Possibly more convenient placement of the sensor for unlocking the phone.
- Lower Price: Usually offers better value for budget-conscious consumers.
- Dolby Atmos: Enhanced audio capabilities offering spatial audio.
- Exposure Compensation and Night Mode Additional camera features for a better photography experience.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Mi 11 Pro: Significantly more expensive than the Poco X3 GT.
- Poco X3 GT: Lacks the high-end features found in the Mi 11 Pro, such as advanced camera capabilities, a superior display, wireless charging and more powerful GPS.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro - Ideal User:
- Power User: Gamers, content creators, or anyone who needs the highest possible performance and features.
- Photography Enthusiast: Users who value high-quality photos and videos, including telephoto and wide-angle capabilities.
- Media Consumption: Users who prioritize the best possible display quality for watching videos, reading, and browsing.
- Wireless Charging Advocates: Users who desire faster wireless charging and reverse wireless charging capabilities.
Use Cases:
- Gaming with demanding titles at high graphic settings and stable frame rates.
- Filming videos in 4K/8K resolution with good stabilization and audio quality.
- Professional-grade photo editing with excellent display calibration.
- Long sessions of media consumption in various environments using the brighter screen.
- Using reverse wireless charging for other devices.
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT - Ideal User:
- Budget-Conscious User: Users seeking a capable smartphone without the high cost.
- Everyday User: Suitable for general tasks, social media, and casual gaming.
- Comfort-Oriented User: Prefers a lightweight phone for ease of handling.
- Audio Enthusiast: Wants a device with better spatial audio.
Use Cases:
- Daily smartphone tasks including web browsing, social media, and communication.
- Casual mobile gaming with less resource-intensive games.
- Enjoying movies and music with Dolby Atmos audio enhancements.
- Users who want a convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor for unlocking the phone.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The Mi 11 Pro is significantly more expensive.
- How important are display quality and camera capabilities? Mi 11 Pro has significant advantages here.
- Do you prioritize performance or comfort? Mi 11 Pro offers better performance, while the Poco X3 GT is lighter.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: High-End Performance and Features: If you need the best possible experience regardless of price, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro is the clear choice with its superior display, camera, performance, wireless charging and GPS capabilities.
- Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious and Everyday Use: If you are looking for a reliable smartphone for everyday use, casual gaming and a lightweight build then the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT offers great value for the money.
- Scenario 3: Photography is Critical: The Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro is the superior choice for users who prioritize camera quality and video recording, offering more versatile lenses and higher video resolution.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro.
Reasoning:
While I appreciate the value proposition of the Poco X3 GT, the Mi 11 Pro's advantages in key areas align better with my preferences.
Specifically:
- Display Quality: I prioritize screen quality for media consumption, reading, and general use, and the Mi 11 Pro's AMOLED screen with higher resolution, brightness and pixel density is significantly superior for daily use.
- Camera Versatility: As a regular user of smartphone cameras, I value the versatility offered by the Mi 11 Pro's additional lenses, larger sensor, and superior video capabilities.
- Performance: Although I'm not a heavy gamer, I appreciate having the extra processing power of the Snapdragon 888 for smoother performance in various applications and tasks.
- Added Features: Having wireless charging and reverse wireless charging is a plus for me, along with enhanced GPS accuracy.
While the price is a factor, the Mi 11 Pro's superior build quality, advanced camera features, high quality display, fast wireless charging and better performance capabilities would justify the investment for my use case.
