Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs. Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 164.3 × 74.6 × 8.5 mm, 208g | 162.5 × 76.7 × 8.5 mm, 210g | Very similar in size and weight; Mi 11 Pro is slightly taller and less wide, while F4 GT is a bit wider; The weight difference is negligible |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.81" | 6.67" | Mi 11 Pro has a slightly larger screen for a more immersive viewing experience; F4 GT is a little more compact. |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 | 1080x2400 | Mi 11 Pro offers much sharper visuals, resulting in crisper text and images, especially noticeable for detailed content. F4 GT has a standard FHD+ resolution. |
| PPI | 515 | 395 | The Mi 11 Pro's higher pixel density makes the display look significantly clearer and more detailed compared to the F4 GT |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both provide a smooth scrolling and gaming experience. |
| Brightness | 1700 nits | 0 nits | Mi 11 Pro provides significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight, F4 GT brightness is not specified. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | F4 GT’s newer chipset offers better overall performance, including faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved efficiency in demanding tasks such as gaming and video editing. |
| AnTuTu Score | 854,267 | 1,178,365 | F4 GT demonstrates notably higher performance based on benchmark scores; Expect better frame rates in games and smoother UI navigation. |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 | F4 GT's GPU provides a more significant increase in graphical processing, resulting in smoother gameplay and better performance in graphic intensive tasks. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.95, 1/1.12" sensor | 64MP, f/1.73, 1/1.7" sensor | Mi 11 Pro's larger sensor captures more light, potentially leading to better low-light performance, better dynamic range, and superior natural bokeh. F4 GT has higher megapixels and wider aperture. |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP, f/2.3, 1/3.4" sensor | 20MP, f/2.4, 1/2" sensor | F4 GT's larger sensor could result in slightly better low-light selfies, Mi 11 Pro has wider aperture. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06" sensor | 8MP, f/2.2, 1/4" sensor | Mi 11 Pro captures more detail with its higher resolution and larger sensor. |
| Macro Lens | None | 2MP, f/2.4 | F4 GT has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots while Mi 11 Pro does not. |
| Telephoto+Macro | 8MP, 1/4.4" sensor | None | Mi 11 Pro features a telephoto lens for zoomed photography, which the F4 GT lacks. |
| Video | Up to 8K@24fps | Up to 4K@60fps | Mi 11 Pro can record higher resolution videos; Both offer HDR video and slow-motion capabilities, with slightly different specs. |
| DxOMark | 124 (Mobile), 118 (Photo), 132 (Video) | Not Tested | Mi 11 Pro has been tested for camera performance, providing a benchmark to compare its camera performance, which is generally better. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 4700mAh | Mi 11 Pro offers slightly longer battery life, potentially extending usage time on a single charge but the difference is small. |
| Charging | 67W Fast Charging | 120W Fast Charging | F4 GT charges significantly faster, reducing charging times dramatically. |
| Features | Wireless charging, Reverse Charging | None | Mi 11 Pro provides wireless and reverse wireless charging options for added convenience. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 (upgradable to 13) | F4 GT has a newer operating system, ensuring up to date features and security patches. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 | Similar standards and capabilities. |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 LE, APT-x, LDAC, AAC | 5.2 LE, LDAC, SBC, AAC | Both support high-quality audio codecs. Mi 11 Pro has slightly better audio codec compatibility (APT-x); F4 GT adds SBC. |
| GPS | Comprehensive | Standard | Mi 11 Pro has broader satellite system support for better accuracy. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128/256 GB | 128/256 GB | Both have the same storage options, plenty for most users. |
| RAM | 8/12 GB | 8/12 GB | Both are capable of handling heavy multitasking and gaming scenarios. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither supports expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Hi-Res, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res, Stereo Speakers | F4 GT offers a more immersive audio experience with Dolby Atmos. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint | basic fingerprint | side-mounted | F4 GT has a more convenient and faster side-mounted fingerprint sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Advantages:
- Superior Display: Higher resolution and pixel density for significantly sharper visuals. Much higher brightness, offering better outdoor visibility.
- Enhanced Camera System: Larger main camera sensor and a dedicated telephoto lens for versatile photography capabilities. Better low-light performance with large sensor.
- Wireless Charging: Offers 67W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging for added convenience.
- More Precise Location Tracking: Supports more satellite systems for accurate GPS.
- Additional Features: Optical zoom, Optical Stabilization, Laser AF, Phase Detection Autofocus, Reverse Charging, AF assist beam, RAW recording capabilities.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Advantages:
- Superior Performance: Newer and more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset for faster processing.
- Faster Charging: Significantly faster 120W charging dramatically reduces charging times.
- Macro Camera: Includes a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography.
- Software: Comes with a newer Android OS (Android 12) out of the box, with upgrade to 13.
- Dolby Atmos: Offers a slightly better immersive audio experience.
- More Advanced Fingerprint Sensor: Features a side-mounted sensor.
- Additional Features: Flicker sensor, Gimbal, Exposure compensation, Dual capture, Night Mode.
Trade-offs:
- Mi 11 Pro: Sacrifices some processing power and gaming performance for better display quality and a more versatile camera.
- Poco F4 GT: Prioritizes performance and charging speed over display resolution and camera sensor quality.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Ideal Users:
- Multimedia Consumers: Users who prioritize a high-quality display for watching videos, browsing, and viewing content, especially outdoors.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who value camera versatility with a larger sensor, telephoto lens, and more advanced features (OIS, RAW, etc.).
- Power Users: Users who appreciate wireless charging, a comprehensive set of features, and don't mind sacrificing some top-tier gaming performance for that.
Use Cases:
- Professional photography/videography.
- Outdoor usage in bright sunlight.
- Immersive movie/video watching.
- Content creation.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Ideal Users:
- Gamers: Users who prioritize peak performance, a fast processor, and a smooth gaming experience.
- Users on the Go: Individuals who need super-fast charging and care more about performance than camera.
- Budget-Conscious Performance Seekers: Users looking for a powerful device without breaking the bank.
Use Cases:
- High-performance gaming.
- Fast-paced multitasking.
- Users who need to quickly charge and go.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Display Priority: Do you value a higher resolution, sharper, brighter screen over peak performance for gaming?
- Camera Needs: Do you prioritize versatile camera features such as optical zoom and RAW recording or do you want a performance oriented experience?
- Charging Preference: Is fast charging speed more important to you than wireless charging and reverse charging?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Professional Content Creator:
- Recommendation: Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro. Its superior display, versatile camera system (including telephoto and RAW), higher resolution video and wireless charging capabilities make it ideal for content creators.
- Scenario 2: Hardcore Mobile Gamer:
- Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. Its focus on performance, faster charging, make it the better choice for gamers.
- Scenario 3: Everyday User on a Budget:
- Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. It provides great value with its focus on performance, new OS, faster charging, and more advanced fingerprint sensor.
My Choice
If I had to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro. Here's why:
While the Poco F4 GT offers a performance advantage and faster charging, my priorities lean more towards a superior display and a more versatile camera system for my everyday usage. The sharper resolution, increased brightness, and larger sensor on the Mi 11 Pro are more valuable to me than a slightly faster chipset. I also appreciate the wireless charging capabilities and the more comprehensive feature set that it provides for photography and video.
While I acknowledge the performance of the F4 GT, the Mi 11 Pro aligns better with my typical use cases, which include multimedia consumption, content creation, and capturing moments with a high-quality camera. The Mi 11 Pro delivers a more well-rounded experience that suits my needs and is ultimately more appealing despite being a generation older.
