Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date April 2, 2021 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 104.18 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 208 g 188.6 g
Height 164.3 mm 170.8 mm
Width 74.6 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Green
  • Purple
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.81 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 91.4 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 515 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1500 nits 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 107.81 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.99 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs. Motorola Razr 40

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Mi 11 ProMotorola Razr 40Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableRazr 40 offers a unique foldable design for portability; Mi 11 Pro is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions164.3 × 74.6 × 8.5 mm170.8 × 74 × 7.4 mmRazr 40 is taller but thinner; Mi 11 Pro is more compact overall. Razr 40 has a smaller footprint when folded.
Weight208g188.6gRazr 40 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable to hold for longer periods.
Display
Size6.81"6.9"Both have very large screens, but the Razr 40 is slightly larger.
Resolution1440x32001080x2640Mi 11 Pro has a much sharper display with greater detail; better for media consumption, text clarity.
Pixel Density515 PPI413 PPIMi 11 Pro's higher PPI provides a more crisp and detailed image.
TechnologyAMOLED(Not Specified)Mi 11 Pro's AMOLED offers superior contrast, blacks, and color accuracy; Razr 40 technology not specified, unable to compare
Refresh Rate120Hz144HzRazr 40 has a slightly smoother scrolling experience; Both are very smooth for the average user.
Brightness1700 nits1400 nitsMi 11 Pro is much brighter, making it significantly better for outdoor viewing in sunny conditions.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)Mi 11 Pro's chipset is more powerful, offering faster app loading and smoother performance for demanding games.
AnTuTu Score854,267699,600Mi 11 Pro provides a more fluid and responsive experience for intensive tasks like gaming and video editing.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 644Mi 11 Pro's GPU is more powerful, offering better graphics performance for games.
Camera
Main Camera Resolution50MP64MPRazr 40 has higher resolution, but sensor quality matters; unable to compare sensor size and model due to missing values.
Main Camera Aperturef/1.95f/1.8Razr 40's wider aperture (lower f-number) might perform better in low light.
Front Camera Resolution20MP32MPRazr 40 has higher resolution for selfies.
Front Camera Aperturef/2.3f/2.45Mi 11 Pro's wider aperture will allow more light, likely better for low-light selfies
Wide Angle Lens13MPNoneMi 11 Pro has a dedicated ultra-wide camera for capturing more in a single frame.
Wide Angle + Macro LensNone13MPRazr 40 can take ultrawide and macro photos using the same lens.
Telephoto Lens8MP (with macro)NoneMi 11 Pro has a dedicated telephoto lens with macro capabilities for zoom and close-up shots.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 4K@30fpsMi 11 Pro can record higher resolution video, suitable for professional use.
DxOMark Score124 (Overall)Not TestedMi 11 Pro scored well in DxOMark, the Razr 40 has not been tested making comparison impossible.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4200mAhMi 11 Pro has a larger battery, likely offering better battery life.
Charging67W fast charging33W fast chargingMi 11 Pro charges significantly faster, reducing downtime.
Wireless Charging67W8WMi 11 Pro has faster and reverse wireless charging.
Other
Operating SystemAndroid 11Android 13Razr 40 comes with a newer version of Android, likely offering more features and updates.
Bluetooth5.25.3Razr 40 has a newer version of Bluetooth.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage, users should consider this when selecting models.
Fingerprint SensorBasicSide-mountedRazr 40 offers a more modern and faster fingerprint sensor placement.
Screen ProtectionGorilla Glass VictusGorilla Glass VictusBoth phones use the same screen protection technology.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, pixel density, and brightness, offering a crisper, clearer, and more visible screen, especially outdoors. Uses AMOLED for better colors and contrast (Razr 40 display tech is not specified).
  • More Powerful Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset and Adreno 660 GPU provide noticeably faster performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Better Camera System: Offers a dedicated wide-angle, telephoto lens with better low-light performance due to wider apertures, and 8K video recording. Higher DxOMark score.
  • Faster Charging: Both wired (67W vs 33W) and wireless (67W vs 8W), and reverse wireless charging at 10W
  • Larger Battery: 5000mAh, which likely translates to longer battery life and less need for frequent charging.
  • More comprehensive GPS: Better GPS location and accuracy.

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a unique form factor that is more compact when folded, making it very pocketable.
  • Newer Android Version: Comes with Android 13, which should provide a more up-to-date experience and longer software support.
  • Slightly Smoother Display: 144Hz refresh rate over 120Hz, making animations a little bit smoother.
  • Newer Bluetooth Version: comes with Bluetooth 5.3 versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro's 5.2
  • Lighter Build: More comfortable to hold and carry around.
  • eSIM Support: Offers eSIM support for easier switching between carriers.
  • Modern side-mounted fingerprint scanner: offers a faster fingerprint scanner.
  • Macro Camera: Offers a combined wide-angle and macro camera setup.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro: Is a larger, heavier phone, and does not have a foldable screen
  • Motorola Razr 40: Compromises on screen sharpness, brightness, performance, and camera capabilities for a foldable design and compact form.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Ideal User:

  • Power Users: Users who need maximum performance for demanding applications, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Media Enthusiasts: Those who prioritize display quality for watching videos and browsing the web.
  • Photography and Videography: Users who want a versatile and capable camera system, including high-resolution video recording.
  • Travelers: Users who need a long battery and great GPS location and accuracy.

Use Cases for Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro:

  • Gaming, including graphically intensive games.
  • Professional photography and videography.
  • Watching high-resolution videos.
  • Extensive multitasking between many applications.
  • Outdoor use in bright sunlight.

Motorola Razr 40 Ideal User:

  • Fashion Conscious/Trend Setters: Users who want a unique, stylish, and compact phone.
  • Portability Focused: Those who prioritize a smaller phone that can fit easily in a pocket or bag.
  • Casual Smartphone Users: Users who primarily use their phones for social media, web browsing, and general communication.
  • Those Looking for the latest Software Experience: Users who wish to use the latest Android version.

Use Cases for Motorola Razr 40:

  • Easy pocket carry.
  • Quick access to apps and notifications while folded.
  • Social media browsing and communication.
  • Those wanting a modern and sleek form factor.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro, being an older flagship, may offer better value for performance at its current price point compared to the Razr 40, particularly if purchased used or discounted.
  • The Razr 40's value proposition lies in its unique foldable design. However, its performance and camera capabilities are not top-tier.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. Do you prioritize performance and display quality or portability and a unique form factor?
  2. How important is the camera system for your daily usage?
  3. What is more important: Battery life and fast charging or a more compact and lightweight design?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Performance and Display Focused. If you value maximum performance, a crisp display, and a capable camera system, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro is the better option. It excels in tasks like gaming, video editing, and media consumption.

  • Scenario 2: Portability and Unique Form Factor. If you prioritize a compact, stylish phone that is easy to carry around, the Motorola Razr 40 is a more appropriate choice. You'll have to compromise on screen quality, performance, and camera capabilities.

  • Scenario 3: Balanced Experience with Modern Software. If you want an overall balanced experience, the newest software, and the added benefits of a foldable phone, the Razr 40 is a great choice, but be prepared to compromise on areas like resolution, brightness, processing power, battery, and camera capabilities.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro. Despite being an older phone, it is superior in core areas that matter most to me: display quality, performance, battery, and camera capability. The significantly brighter and higher resolution screen on the Mi 11 Pro would be much more comfortable for outdoor usage, and the better CPU/GPU will make the phone last longer in terms of usage. The camera system and battery make it a more versatile option for my needs. I acknowledge the Razr 40's appeal in its foldable design, however, this does not justify the trade-offs in other areas that are more important for my daily needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.