Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Motorola Moto G53 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 2, 2021 December 15, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 104.18 cm³ 99.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 208 g 183 g
Height 164.3 mm 162.7 mm
Width 74.6 mm 74.7 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Green
  • Purple
  • Ink Blue
  • Arctic Silver
  • Pale Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.81 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 91.4 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 515 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 107.81 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.99 mAh/cm³ 50.17 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 660 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureXiaomi Mi 11 ProMotorola Moto G53Practical Impact
Dimensions164.3 × 74.6 × 8.5 mm162.7 × 74.7 × 8.2 mmXiaomi is slightly taller and thicker. G53 is marginally more compact. The difference is small and likely unnoticeable for most users.
Weight208g183gThe G53 is notably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. Mi 11 Pro might feel heavier during long phone sessions.
BuildGorilla Glass Victus FrontUnknownXiaomi Mi 11 Pro is more resistant to scratches and drops. G53's screen protection is unknown which might require a screen protector for daily use.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Mi 11 ProMotorola Moto G53Practical Impact
Size6.81"6.5"Xiaomi offers a more immersive experience for media consumption and gaming. G53 is a bit more pocketable.
Resolution1440x3200720x1600Xiaomi has a much sharper, clearer display, better for reading, detailed images, and enjoying high-resolution content. G53's display may appear pixelated.
PPI515270Xiaomi offers significantly better clarity and sharpness. G53 will have visible pixelation in text and fine details.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDXiaomi offers better colors, contrast, and deeper blacks, superior for video and photo viewing. G53's display will be less vibrant and have poorer contrast.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth provide smooth scrolling and animations, but the Xiaomi's superior panel technology makes better use of this refresh rate.
Brightness1700 nits0 nitsXiaomi has much better visibility in bright sunlight. The G53's brightness is not specified but is unlikely to compete. Likely unusable outdoors.

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Mi 11 ProMotorola Moto G53Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ (8 nm)Xiaomi offers significantly faster processing speeds, better app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. G53 is slower, suitable for basic tasks, and casual gaming only.
AnTuTu Score854,267319,946Xiaomi handles demanding apps and games with ease. G53 will experience lag with demanding games and during heavy multitasking. Xiaomi is more future-proof.
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 619Xiaomi delivers significantly better graphics performance, better for gaming and graphics-intensive apps. G53's graphics capabilities are weaker.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Mi 11 ProMotorola Moto G53Practical Impact
Main Camera50MP, f/1.95, 1/1.12" Samsung GN2, 1.4µm50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN1, 0.64µmXiaomi captures significantly more light and detail, performs much better in low light, produces superior overall image quality due to a larger sensor and pixel size. G53 may struggle in low light due to smaller sensor and pixel size, with reduced detail and dynamic range.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.3, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3T2, 0.8µm8MP, f/2.0Xiaomi captures much more detailed selfies. G53 is less detailed. G53 has wider aperture, better in low light.
Wide Angle Lens13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06" Omnivision OV13B10, 1.12µmNoneXiaomi offers ultra-wide shots, adding versatility. G53 is limited to standard field of view.
Macro LensNone2MP, f/2.4G53 allows for dedicated close-up shots, although quality is likely to be limited due to low resolution sensor. Xiaomi cannot take macro shots natively.
Telephoto Lens8MP, 1/4.4" Omnivision OV08A10, 1.00µmNoneXiaomi offers optical zoom capabilities. G53 has no optical zoom.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps with HDR, EIS, Slow-mo 1920fps1080p@30fps, Slow-mo 120fpsXiaomi can capture high-resolution professional-grade video content with advanced stabilization options and slow-mo. G53 is limited to 1080p recording and a basic slow-motion.
DxOMark Score124 (Mobile), 118 (Photo), 132 (Video)NoneXiaomi has excellent camera performance confirmed by DxOMark scores. The G53 has not been tested.
Camera FeaturesWide range including 4K, 8K video, OIS, RAW etc.Dual camera, Night Mode, basic modesXiaomi provides more features for professional photography and videography enthusiasts. G53 offers basic camera features and a dedicated night mode.

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Mi 11 ProMotorola Moto G53Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth should provide comparable battery life, depending on usage.
Charging67W fast, 67W wireless18W fastXiaomi charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime. Xiaomi also has 67W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging.
Battery FeaturesReverse, Wireless Charging10W Charger in BoxXiaomi offers additional flexibility via reverse charging. G53 has a 10W charger in the box, convenient.

Other

FeatureXiaomi Mi 11 ProMotorola Moto G53Practical Impact
OSAndroid 11Android 13G53 comes with newer Android version.
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6, MIMOWi-Fi 5Xiaomi offers faster wireless speeds and better performance in crowded networks.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2, A2DP, LE, Apt-x, LDAC, AACBluetooth 5.1, A2DP, LE, Apt-x, LDAC, SBC, AACXiaomi offers slightly more energy-efficient Bluetooth. Both provide high-quality audio output, Motorola has wider codec support.
GPSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a), BeiDou (B2), NavIC System, QZSSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoXiaomi is more accurate in location tracking, supports more satellite systems for more reliable GPS.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM / eSIMG53 supports eSIM, allowing for digital carrier switching, while the Xiaomi uses a traditional Dual Nano Sim setup.
Internal Storage128GB or 256 GB128GBXiaomi has an option for more storage.
RAM8 GB or 12 GB4 GB or 8 GB or 6 GBXiaomi offers more RAM, smoother multitasking and handling of demanding apps.
Expandable StorageNoNoBoth do not offer expandable storage. Users must manage internal storage.
AudioHi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesDolby AtmosXiaomi offers high-quality audio experience. Motorola offers a surround sound experience.
SecurityBasic fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorMotorola offers more secure and convenient fingerprint unlocking.
SensorsFingerprint, Heart Rate, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, CompassXiaomi provides more sensors for a richer user experience, such as gyroscope.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Much higher resolution, pixel density, AMOLED technology, and brightness. The display is superior for media consumption, gaming, and readability.
  • Powerful Performance: Top-tier Snapdragon 888 chipset results in significantly faster processing, smooth multitasking, and excellent gaming capabilities.
  • Advanced Camera System: Larger main sensor, wide-angle lens, telephoto lens, much more comprehensive and flexible for all types of photography. Offers 8K video recording and OIS.
  • Faster Charging: 67W wired and 67W wireless charging compared to 18W on the G53, leading to significantly less charging downtime.
  • Better Connectivity: Supports newer Wi-Fi standard (Wi-Fi 6), more GPS satellites, providing faster and more stable connections.
  • Premium Audio: Offers Hi-Res audio, Stereo Speakers, and 3 Microphones, great for high-fidelity audio and voice recording.

  • Practical Implications: The Mi 11 Pro offers a flagship-level experience, ideal for users who demand the best possible display, performance, and camera quality, coupled with fast charging and premium features.

Motorola Moto G53 Advantages:

  • Newer OS: Comes with Android 13 out of the box.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended periods of use.
  • eSIM Support: Offers more convenient digital carrier switching.
  • Wider Selfie Aperture: The front facing camera has a slightly wider aperture for better low-light performance.
  • Macro Lens: Ability to take close up pictures, a feature which the Mi 11 Pro lacks.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More user-friendly and convenient than basic fingerprint sensors.

  • Practical Implications: The G53 is better for users who prioritize lightweight design, the latest Android version, eSIM support, basic camera functions, and good battery life.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Mi 11 Pro: Is heavier and older, with a fingerprint sensor that is not side-mounted.
  • Moto G53: Has a significantly lower-resolution screen, much less powerful processor, and a considerably weaker camera system compared to the Mi 11 Pro.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Ideal User:

  • Power Users: Individuals who demand top-tier performance for gaming, heavy multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Multimedia Enthusiasts: Users who consume a lot of video and value a high-quality display with vibrant colors, high resolution, and brightness.
  • Photography Lovers: Users who want versatile cameras for different scenarios, including wide-angle, telephoto, and high-quality video recording.
  • Professionals: Those needing fast charging, strong performance, and high-quality audio for communication and media editing.
  • Use Cases: Gaming, video editing, photography, videography, streaming, high-end browsing, graphic design.

Motorola Moto G53 Ideal User:

  • Casual Users: Individuals who primarily use their phone for basic communication, social media, and light browsing.
  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: People looking for a cost-effective device with a decent battery life and the latest Android OS.
  • Users Seeking Lightweight Devices: Those who prefer a comfortable, lightweight design.
  • Users Needing eSIM support: Users wanting the convenience of digital carrier switching.
  • Use Cases: Basic communication, social media, light browsing, media playback (casual use), occasional photography.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro offers significantly better performance, display, camera, and charging capabilities, which are expected from a premium device. The G53 is a budget-friendly phone, making it a good choice for those seeking affordability.
  • The Mi 11 Pro is an older model so it may be available at a reduced price than when it was released, making it a good value option for those seeking flagship level performance.
  • The value proposition depends on the user's specific needs and budget.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is my primary use case for the phone? (Gaming, photography, basic communication, etc.)
  2. How much do I value display quality and camera performance? (Critical, important, or just adequate?)
  3. Is a lighter, more compact phone important, or is performance more crucial?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Power user needs maximum performance and display quality - Recommendation: Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro. It offers much better display and performance than the G53.
  • Scenario 2: Budget-conscious user needs basic functionality and long battery life - Recommendation: Motorola Moto G53. It's a more affordable option that provides all basic features at the cost of a lower resolution display and less processing power.
  • Scenario 3: User prioritizes a lightweight device and the latest Android version with basic camera use - Recommendation: Motorola Moto G53. It offers a more compact design and a newer version of Android.
  • Scenario 4: Camera and videography are of high importance - Recommendation: Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro. It offers a significantly superior camera system and much better video recording features.

What I Would Choose and Why

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would choose the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro. Here's why:

  1. Display Quality: The significantly higher resolution, AMOLED panel, and brightness of the Mi 11 Pro's display make a huge difference for media consumption, gaming, and even daily use. I value a high-quality screen.
  2. Performance: As a user who runs demanding apps and games, the Snapdragon 888 chipset in the Mi 11 Pro is crucial. I need a phone that doesn't lag and can handle complex tasks smoothly.
  3. Camera Capabilities: I enjoy taking photos and videos, and the Mi 11 Pro’s camera with its larger sensor, wide-angle, telephoto lenses, and 8K video recording is far superior. The results from the Mi 11 Pro will be much better than from the Moto G53.
  4. Fast Charging: The fast wired and wireless charging is a must-have for me. I do not like waiting for my phone to charge for a long time.
  5. Overall Experience: Although the G53 has some attractive points like being lighter and having a newer OS, the overall user experience with the Mi 11 Pro will be far superior.

While the Motorola Moto G53 is a competent budget option with its lighter design and a more recent version of Android, it simply can't compete with the superior display, processing power, and camera capabilities of the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro, which are priorities for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.