Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs. Motorola Moto G34
1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro | Motorola Moto G34 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.5 mm | 162.7 x 74.6 x 8 mm | Mi 11 Pro is slightly taller and thicker, but both have similar width. The Mi 11 Pro has a larger volume. |
Weight | 208g | 179g | Moto G34 is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.81" | 6.5" | Mi 11 Pro offers a larger screen, better for media consumption and multitasking. |
Resolution | 1440x3200 | 720x1600 | Mi 11 Pro's display is significantly sharper, with much more detail. |
PPI | 515 | 270 | Mi 11 Pro has a much higher pixel density, resulting in clearer text and images. |
Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Mi 11 Pro provides deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors, while also being more energy efficient with dark mode. |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 1700 nits | 0 nits | Mi 11 Pro's screen is significantly brighter and easier to view outdoors in sunlight. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mi 11 Pro offers much faster processing, better multitasking and gaming performance. |
AnTuTu Score | 854,267 | 424,100 | Mi 11 Pro delivers a far more responsive and fluid experience for demanding tasks. |
GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 619 | Mi 11 Pro handles graphics-intensive tasks, like gaming, much better. |
Camera | |||
Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.95, 1/1.12" sensor, 1.4µm pixels | 50MP, f/1.8, 1.0µm pixels | Mi 11 Pro's larger sensor and pixel size typically capture more light and detail in various lighting conditions. Moto G34 has slightly wider aperture. |
Selfie Camera | 20MP, f/2.3, 1/3.4" sensor, 0.8µm pixels | 16MP | Mi 11 Pro's selfie camera provides slightly better detail with higher resolution and more light with a bigger sensor. Moto G34 selfie specs are missing pixel size and sensor model. |
Wide Angle Lens | 13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06" sensor, 1.12µm pixels | Not Available | Mi 11 Pro allows for wider shots. |
Macro Lens | Not Available | 2MP, f/2.4 | Moto G34 offers dedicated macro lens for closeup photography. |
Telephoto + Macro Lens | 8MP, 1/4.4" sensor, 1.0µm pixels | Not Available | Mi 11 Pro has a telephoto lens for zoom capabilities and macro abilities. |
Video Recording | Up to 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps with HDR and EIS | 1080p@30fps | Mi 11 Pro captures far higher quality videos with more advanced features. |
DxOMark Score | Mobile: 124 (Photo: 118, Video: 132) | Not Available | Mi 11 Pro's camera performs significantly better in photo and video quality according to DxOMark. |
Camera Features | More features such as OIS, optical zoom, 4K and 8K video | Fewer features | Mi 11 Pro offers more advanced camera capabilities. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both offer the same battery capacity. |
Charging | 67W Fast Charging, 67W Wireless, 10W Reverse Wireless | 20W Fast Charging | Mi 11 Pro charges much faster, and has wireless charging capabilities. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11 | Android 13 | Moto G34 has a newer version of Android out of the box, but upgrades can depend on manufacturer. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6, Dual band, Hotspot, Direct, Display, MiMO | Wi-Fi 6, Dual band, Hotspot, Direct, Display | Mi 11 Pro supports an additional Wi-Fi MiMO feature for potential improvements in connection stability. |
Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX, LDAC, AAC | 5.1, A2DP, LE | Mi 11 Pro supports a newer version of Bluetooth and more audio codecs for better audio quality with compatible devices. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a), BeiDou (B2), NavIC System | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | Mi 11 Pro has more comprehensive satellite support for better location accuracy. |
Storage & RAM | |||
Internal Storage | 128GB or 256GB | 64GB, 128GB, or 256GB | Both offer 256GB as max. Mi 11 Pro only comes in 128 or 256 GB, while the Moto G34 offers a 64GB base. |
RAM | 8GB or 12GB | 4GB or 8GB | Mi 11 Pro has significantly more RAM for better performance. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage. |
Audio | |||
Audio Quality | Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphones | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones | Mi 11 Pro provides higher quality audio playback. |
Security | |||
Fingerprint Sensor | basic fingerprint sensor | side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Moto G34 has a more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor. |
Build Quality | |||
Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Unknown | Mi 11 Pro offers better screen protection. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Fingerprint, Heart Rate, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer | Mi 11 Pro has more sensors for better functionality. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Advantages:
- Superior Display: Higher resolution, pixel density, AMOLED technology, and much higher brightness offer a significantly better visual experience, especially outdoors.
- Far Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 888 chipset offers significantly better processing power for faster app loading, gaming, and multitasking.
- Advanced Camera System: More capable camera hardware, including a larger main sensor, additional lenses (telephoto, wide), 8K video recording, and OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) offer much higher quality photos and videos with more versatility.
- Faster Charging and Wireless Charging: 67W fast charging and wireless charging are significantly faster and more convenient than the 20W charging on the Moto G34.
- More RAM Options: Up to 12GB of RAM allows for better performance with demanding apps.
- Better Audio Quality: Hi-Res audio, 3 microphones.
- More comprehensive sensors: Gyroscope and Heart Rate sensors.
- More robust screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus.
Motorola Moto G34 Advantages:
- Lighter Weight: More comfortable for prolonged use due to its lighter weight.
- Newer OS: Comes with Android 13 out of the box.
- Macro Lens: Offers a dedicated macro lens for detailed close-up photography, although lower resolution.
- Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: More ergonomic location for the fingerprint sensor.
- Wider Aperture on Main Camera: Slightly wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.95) on the main camera could offer marginally better low-light performance (though the overall performance is still much lower than the Mi 11 Pro).
Significant Trade-offs:
- Mi 11 Pro: Older Android version out of box, heavier
- Moto G34: Much lower performance and camera quality, very low screen resolution and brightness, slower charging.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro Ideal User:
- Power Users: Gamers, media creators, and those who multitask heavily will benefit from the superior performance.
- Photography Enthusiasts: The advanced camera system, including telephoto and wide-angle lenses, will appeal to users who want versatile photography options.
- Media Consumers: The high-resolution AMOLED display with high brightness is ideal for those who watch videos and enjoy detailed visuals.
- Users who need fast charging: The 67W fast charging is a key feature for those who want to quickly top up their phone's battery.
- Users who value audio quality: Hi-Res audio is a great feature for users with compatible devices.
Motorola Moto G34 Ideal User:
- Budget-Conscious Users: Those looking for a basic, functional phone at a more affordable price point will appreciate the Moto G34.
- Users who value lightweight phones: Those who want a light and easy to carry phone.
- Casual Users: People who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging will find this phone adequate.
- Users with basic photography needs: Those needing a simple camera for basic photos will find the camera sufficient.
Specific Use Cases:
- Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro: Gaming, video editing, high-resolution media consumption, professional photography, fast charging while on-the-go.
- Motorola Moto G34: Basic web browsing, social media, messaging, general usage, users who need a cheap phone.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro offers a better overall experience and value for those who are willing to pay more for the higher-end features.
- The Motorola Moto G34 is a good option for users on a tight budget that are willing to sacrifice key features.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The Mi 11 Pro will be more expensive, while the Moto G34 offers a more budget-friendly option.
- How important is performance to you? If you game, multitask, or want high performance in general, the Mi 11 Pro is the clear choice.
- What are your photography and video needs? If high-quality photos and videos are crucial, the Mi 11 Pro's advanced camera system is far better.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Performance & Camera Priority: If you need a phone that excels in performance and camera quality without budget limitations, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro is the recommended choice.
- Scenario 2: Budget & Basic Needs: If you're on a strict budget and need a functional phone for basic tasks, the Motorola Moto G34 would be a better option.
- Scenario 3: Mixed Use, balanced performance and cost: If you need a phone for a variety of tasks and want to balance performance with cost, you may want to consider alternative phones that are positioned between these two phones. The Motorola Moto G34 is more of a budget-level phone while the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro is more high-end and better in all respects.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro. Despite being an older phone, its significantly better performance, display quality, camera system, and charging capabilities outweigh the Moto G34's advantages. The Mi 11 Pro offers a much more premium experience and better user experience overall, especially for my usage, which often involves media consumption, photography, and some mobile gaming. The older Android version is a minor concern compared to the major upgrades in other crucial areas. The significant differences in the screen quality, performance, and camera capabilities would be worth the higher price point for me. The only downside for me is that it is heavier.