Xiaomi 13T vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 13T
Xiaomi 13T
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date September 26, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.37 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.46 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 193 g 189 g
Height 162.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.7 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Meadow Green
  • Alpine Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2600 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.91 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi 13TZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Virtually identical in size and feel.
Weight (g)193189Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Fingerprint SensorUnder DisplaySide-mountedPreference-based; under-display feels more modern, side-mounted can be faster.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 68B colors, 144HzIPS LCD, 90HzXiaomi offers significantly better contrast, color accuracy, and smoother scrolling with higher refresh rate and AMOLED technology.
Resolution1220 x 2712720 x 1612Xiaomi provides much sharper visuals due to significantly higher resolution.
Peak Brightness2600 nitsNot specifiedXiaomi's display will be far more visible in direct sunlight. Missing peak brightness for ZTE makes a detailed comparison impossible.
Refresh Rate144Hz90HzXiaomi offers a noticeably smoother user experience, especially in gaming and scrolling.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Xiaomi's processor is significantly more powerful, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)The architecture and clock speeds indicate a substantial performance advantage for the Xiaomi device.
GPUMali-G610 MC6Mali-G57 MP1Xiaomi offers superior graphics performance, crucial for demanding games and visual tasks.
RAM12GB4GBXiaomi offers significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Storage256GB256GBStorage capacity is equal in both devices.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (HDR, EIS), various other options1080p@30fpsXiaomi provides higher resolution video recording and more features like HDR and EIS for improved quality and stabilization. Detailed camera sensor specifications are missing for both, limiting a complete comparison.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity is the same, but real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi 13T Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Dimensity 8200 Ultra outperforms the Unisoc T606 by a wide margin, resulting in a much smoother and faster user experience.
  • Much better display: The high-resolution AMOLED with 144Hz refresh rate provides a vibrant, smooth, and responsive visual experience.
  • More RAM for multitasking: 12GB RAM ensures seamless switching between apps and prevents background processes from being killed.
  • Superior video recording capabilities: Offers 4K recording, HDR, and EIS for higher quality videos.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lower price: Belonging to the "low price" range, it's significantly more affordable.
  • Slightly lighter: Though the difference is minimal, it might be noticeable for some users.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi 13T: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, smooth multitasking, and mobile gaming. Suitable for power users, content creators, and gamers.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Good for light users or as a secondary device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the ZTE might suffice; for demanding tasks, the Xiaomi is necessary.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Xiaomi offers a far superior experience in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Moderate Budget, Demanding Usage: Xiaomi 13T
  • Power User, Gamer, Content Creator: Xiaomi 13T

My Choice: Xiaomi 13T

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a lower price point, the Xiaomi 13T provides a significantly superior overall experience due to its vastly more powerful processor, stunning AMOLED display with a high refresh rate, and larger RAM capacity. The performance and display differences alone make the Xiaomi 13T a much more compelling device for my needs. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, which the Xiaomi 13T clearly delivers. The price difference is justified by the substantial upgrade in quality and capabilities.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.