Xiaomi 13T vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 13T
Xiaomi 13T
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date September 26, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.37 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.46 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 193 g 171 g
Height 162.2 mm 161.9 mm
Width 75.7 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Meadow Green
  • Alpine Blue
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2600 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.91 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC6 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi 13TMotorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6 mmMoto G85 is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially improving one-handed use.
Weight193g171gMoto G85 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display Size6.67"6.67"Same size displays.
Display TypeAMOLED, 68B colorsP-OLED, 1B colorsXiaomi 13T's AMOLED with higher color depth will offer significantly richer and more vibrant visuals.
Resolution1220 x 27121080 x 2400Xiaomi 13T boasts a sharper display with higher pixel density (446 ppi vs 395 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate144Hz120HzXiaomi 13T offers a smoother experience, especially noticeable in fast-paced gaming and scrolling.
Peak Brightness2600 nits1600 nitsXiaomi 13T will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)Xiaomi 13T's Dimensity 8200 Ultra is a more powerful chipset, enabling smoother multitasking and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Xiaomi 13T has a higher clocked prime core, leading to faster single-core performance.
GPUMali-G610 MC6Adreno 619Xiaomi 13T likely has a more powerful GPU, beneficial for demanding games and graphic-intensive tasks; however, concrete benchmarks are needed for definitive comparison.
RAM12GB12GBBoth phones have ample RAM for multitasking.
Storage256GB256GBBoth phones offer the same storage capacity.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCamera quality cannot be compared without detailed specifications.
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (HDR, EIS), 1080p various fps (HDR, EIS)1080p@30/60fpsXiaomi 13T offers superior video recording capabilities with 4K resolution and HDR support.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, expected similar battery life, though actual usage will depend on software optimization and user habits.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCharging speeds cannot be compared.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi 13T Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Brighter, sharper, and smoother display with more vibrant colors.
  • More Powerful Performance: Faster processor and likely more powerful GPU for smoother performance in demanding tasks and games.
  • Better Video Recording: 4K recording with HDR and EIS.

Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Slightly Smaller: More comfortable for one-handed use and extended holding.
  • Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 14, potentially offering newer features and longer software support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi 13T: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality, performance, and multimedia consumption (gaming, video recording/watching).

Motorola Moto G85: Suitable for users who prefer a lighter, more compact phone and value a newer Android version out of the box. Good for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and communication.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is display quality and performance a top priority? If yes, the Xiaomi 13T is the clear winner.
  2. Is phone size and weight a major concern? If a lighter and smaller phone is preferred, the Moto G85 is a better option.
  3. How important is having the latest Android version? While updates for the Xiaomi 13T are likely, the Moto G85 ships with the newer version.

My Choice: Xiaomi 13T

While the Moto G85 offers a lighter and more compact design, the Xiaomi 13T's significant advantages in display quality, performance, and video recording capabilities are more compelling to me. I prioritize a smooth and immersive user experience, especially for multimedia consumption and gaming, which the 13T's superior hardware delivers. The slightly larger size and weight are a trade-off I'm willing to make for the significant gains in other areas. The lack of camera specifics makes a complete judgement impossible, but based on the provided information, the Xiaomi 13T offers a more compelling overall package.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.