Xiaomi 13 Ultra vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 21, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 110.79 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 2.96 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 227 g 189 g
Height 163.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.6 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • White
  • Orange
  • Olive Green
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.73 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 522 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1300 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2600 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.13 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 740 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi 13 UltraZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 74.6 x 9.1164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Xiaomi is slightly smaller and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)227189ZTE is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsMissingMissingCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display Type6.73" LTPO AMOLED6.6" IPS LCDXiaomi offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better outdoor visibility with AMOLED. LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate, saving battery.
Resolution1440 x 3200720 x 1612Xiaomi's display is significantly sharper and more detailed, enhancing media consumption and overall visual experience.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzXiaomi provides smoother scrolling and animations, but the difference might not be noticeable for all users.
Peak Brightness2600 nitsMissingXiaomi likely offers better visibility in direct sunlight; information missing for ZTE.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Unisoc T606Xiaomi offers vastly superior performance in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking due to a flagship processor.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Xiaomi's CPU significantly outperforms ZTE's, resulting in faster app loading, smoother operation, and better handling of complex applications.
GPUAdreno 740Mali-G57 MP1Xiaomi provides a much more powerful GPU, enabling high-end gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM12GB/16GB4GB/8GBXiaomi offers more RAM, ensuring smoother multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Quad Camera (Leica collaboration)50MP + 0.3MP Dual CameraXiaomi's camera system is expected to produce significantly better image quality, especially in low light, and offers versatile zoom capabilities with dedicated telephoto lenses. The 0.3MP sensor on the ZTE is practically useless.
Front Camera32MP8MPXiaomi's front camera likely captures higher-resolution selfies with better detail.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@24fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsXiaomi offers vastly superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on optimization and power consumption of other components. Expect Xiaomi to drain faster due to the more powerful hardware and higher resolution display.
Charging SpeedMissingMissingCannot compare charging speeds.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Advantages:

  • Flagship Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and more RAM for a smooth and lag-free experience.
  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, AMOLED technology, and 120Hz refresh rate for vibrant visuals and smooth interactions.
  • Advanced Camera System: Leica collaboration, versatile lenses, and higher resolution for exceptional photo and video quality.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lightweight Design: Noticeably lighter, improving comfort for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Trade-offs:

  • The ZTE sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera capabilities for affordability.
  • The Xiaomi comes at a premium price for its high-end features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi 13 Ultra: Ideal for power users, photographers, videographers, and mobile gamers who demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and a cutting-edge camera.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Appropriate for users who don't demand high performance or advanced features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Xiaomi is a high-end flagship, while the ZTE is a budget device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy gaming, photography, and multitasking benefit from the Xiaomi's power. Basic communication and web browsing are sufficiently handled by the ZTE.
  3. How important are display quality and camera performance? The Xiaomi excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Prioritize Performance and Camera: Xiaomi 13 Ultra
  • Balanced Needs and Moderate Budget: Consider other mid-range options not listed in this comparison.

My Choice: Xiaomi 13 Ultra

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers an attractive price point, the Xiaomi 13 Ultra's superior performance, stunning display, and advanced camera system are decisive factors for me. I prioritize a smooth and lag-free user experience, high-quality visuals for media consumption, and the ability to capture excellent photos and videos. The significant price difference is justified by the substantial leap in overall quality and capabilities. The ZTE is a good budget option, but it doesn't meet my personal needs and preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.