Xiaomi 12 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date December 31, 2021 June 17, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 100.08 cm³ 119.52 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.29 "/g
Weight 204 g 204 g
Height 163.6 mm 169.6 mm
Width 74.6 mm 76.6 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 9.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Purple
  • Gray
  • Coral Green
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.73 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1440 x 3200 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.6 % 82 %
Pixel Density 521 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 400 nits
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1500 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 101.56 mAh/in² 133.26 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.96 mAh/cm³ 50.2 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4600 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) JLQ JR510 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57 MC1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 11
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Xiaomi 12 Pro and the Xiaomi Poco C40. These two phones sit at very different ends of the spectrum, and understanding those differences is key to figuring out which one might be right for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a breakdown of key specifications, focusing on what they mean for real-world use:

FeatureXiaomi 12 ProXiaomi Poco C40Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2 mm12 Pro is more compact and thinner, C40 is larger and bulkier.
Weight204g204gBoth have identical weight.
BuildGlass and MetalPlastic12 Pro feels more premium, C40 is more durable/ less delicate.
Display
Size6.73"6.71"Very similar size, negligibly different.
Resolution1440x3200720x165012 Pro's display is much sharper and clearer, the C40's looks pixelated at times.
Pixel Density (PPI)52126812 Pro offers finer details, text and images are much crisper.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCD12 Pro has vibrant colors, deep blacks, better contrast, C40's display is good for everyday use, but lacks in vibrancy and contrast.
Refresh Rate120Hz60Hz12 Pro has smoother animations, scrolling, and gaming.
Brightness1500 nits0 nits12 Pro can be used comfortably even in bright sunlight, C40 is unlikely to be visible in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm)JLQ JR510 (11nm)12 Pro is much faster and more responsive in day to day tasks, gaming, and multitasking. C40 is adequate for basic tasks only.
AnTuTu Score1,177,498128,94412 Pro is a performance powerhouse, C40 struggles to handle anything demanding.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G57 MC112 Pro has significantly better graphics performance, enabling smoother gaming at higher settings.
Camera
Main Camera50MP f/1.913MP f/1.812 Pro has higher resolution and more light sensitivity.
Selfie Camera32MP5MP f/2.212 Pro captures significantly more detail in selfies.
Wide-Angle50MP f/2.2Not available12 Pro offers wide-angle shots for group photos and landscapes, C40 doesn't.
Portrait Camera50MP f/1.92MP f/2.412 Pro captures detailed, high-resolution portrait photos with excellent depth of field.
VideoUp to 8K @ 24fps1080p @ 30fps12 Pro offers much higher video quality and advanced options.
DxOMark Score129Not tested12 Pro's camera is excellent, C40's camera performance is expected to be basic.
Battery Life
Capacity4600mAh6000mAhC40 has a larger battery, could offer longer battery life, depending on usage patterns.
Charging120W wired, 50W wireless18W wired12 Pro charges rapidly, C40 charging is significantly slower.

2. Key Insights

Xiaomi 12 Pro:

  • Strengths: This phone is a performance and multimedia beast. The AMOLED display with its 120Hz refresh rate is stunning, perfect for media consumption and gaming. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chip ensures that demanding tasks are handled effortlessly. The camera system is versatile and takes high-quality photos in various conditions. The incredibly fast charging is a huge convenience.
  • Competitive Advantages: The Xiaomi 12 Pro stands out with its top-tier display technology, class-leading performance, advanced camera features, and blazing-fast charging capabilities. It's designed for users who demand the absolute best.
  • Trade-offs: The battery life might not be as long as some competitors, despite the fast charging, due to its power-hungry high-end components. The premium build quality also means it is more prone to damage.

Xiaomi Poco C40:

  • Strengths: The main advantage of the C40 is its large 6000mAh battery. Its durable design and affordability makes it attractive to users that need a basic smartphone that lasts for a long time and can handle some bumps and knocks.
  • Competitive Advantages: The Poco C40’s main selling points are its exceptional battery life (potentially) and affordable price. It focuses on the fundamentals rather than premium features.
  • Trade-offs: The C40's performance is noticeably lower, its display is inferior, and the camera system is basic. It's not meant for heavy multitasking or gaming. Charging is slow, and the overall experience is very basic.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Xiaomi 12 Pro User Profile:

  • Best Suited For:

    • Power users, tech enthusiasts, and gamers.
    • Users who prioritize display quality and camera capabilities.
    • Those who value speed and performance.
    • Users who don't mind paying a premium for top-of-the-line features.
  • Use Cases:

    • Intense gaming sessions with demanding graphics.
    • High-quality photography and videography.
    • Demanding multitasking and productivity tasks.
    • Enjoying media content with vibrant colors and smooth motion.

Xiaomi Poco C40 User Profile:

  • Best Suited For:

    • Budget-conscious users who need a basic phone.
    • Users who prioritize battery life over everything else.
    • Users who want a durable phone.
    • Users with very basic smartphone needs.
  • Use Cases:

    • Basic web browsing, social media, and communication.
    • Extended use without needing to recharge frequently.
    • As a backup device or for less demanding tasks.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help users decide:

  1. What are your most important needs? Do you need a powerful phone for gaming and multimedia, or just a basic phone for everyday use?
  2. How important is battery life to you? Are you often away from charging points, or are you ok with charging it daily?
  3. What is your budget? Are you willing to pay more for a high-end experience, or are you looking for the most affordable option?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Power User: If you want the best performance, display, and camera, choose the Xiaomi 12 Pro.
  • Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious User: If you need a basic phone with long battery life and a low price, the Xiaomi Poco C40 is a more practical choice.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced User: If you want a blend of good performance and battery life and a good camera, you may need to consider devices in the middle price bracket instead of these two.

Conclusion

The Xiaomi 12 Pro and Xiaomi Poco C40 serve very different markets. The 12 Pro is for the users who want the very best. The Poco C40 targets users who need a basic smartphone for daily use with extended battery life.

My Choice

If I had to choose between these two, I would go for the Xiaomi 12 Pro. While the Poco C40 offers excellent battery life and an affordable price tag, my daily smartphone usage involves tasks that would greatly benefit from the power and high-quality display of the 12 Pro. I enjoy mobile gaming and the 12 Pro offers the top-tier performance I want. Furthermore, I often rely on my phone for high-quality photos and videos, and the camera on the 12 Pro is significantly better. I also really appreciate the fast charging as it means less time tethered to a wall charger. Yes, it's more expensive, but the premium experience outweighs the extra costs, for my personal use case.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.