Xiaomi 11T vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 11T
Xiaomi 11T
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date October 5, 2021 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 111.05 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 203 g 192 g
Height 164.1 mm 168 mm
Width 76.9 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Moonlight White
  • Celestial Blue
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 800 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.02 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi 11T vs. Poco C65: A Tale of Two Xiaomis

Let's embark on a journey to explore two distinct offerings from Xiaomi: the sleek Xiaomi 11T and the budget-friendly Poco C65. Instead of getting lost in a sea of specs, we'll focus on how these devices translate into real-world experiences for you, the user.

1. Design and Usability: A Visual Dialogue

FeatureXiaomi 11TPoco C65User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz refresh rateIPS LCD, 90Hz refresh rate11T offers vibrant visuals, smoother scrolling, less eye strain.
Interaction FlowDimensity 1200, powerful GPUHelio G85, modest GPU11T ensures seamless multitasking, gaming, and app usage.
AccessibilityFingerprint (side-mounted)Fingerprint (side-mounted)Both offer convenient unlocking.
ErgonomicsSlimmer (8.8mm), lighter (203g)Thicker (9.5mm), slightly heavier11T provides a more premium, comfortable in-hand feel.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration: Painting a Picture

Scenario: Imagine you're a budding photographer capturing a vibrant street festival. The 11T's 108MP camera with a Samsung HM2 sensor, paired with its fast processor, allows you to freeze moments in stunning detail, even in challenging light. The 120Hz display brings your photos to life with breathtaking clarity as you review them. Meanwhile, the Poco C65, with its 50MP main camera, captures decent photos, but might struggle in low light or with fast-moving subjects. Its 90Hz display, while smooth, lacks the vividness of the 11T's AMOLED.

Scenario: You're a mobile gamer immersed in a fast-paced online battle. The 11T's Dimensity 1200 chipset and powerful Mali-G77 MC9 GPU ensures a lag-free, visually rich experience. The Poco C65's Helio G85, while capable for casual gaming, might show some stutter in demanding titles.

3. Inclusive Technology: A Device for Every User

For the Power User: The 11T caters to those seeking a premium experience. Its blazing-fast performance, stunning display, and capable camera system make it ideal for demanding tasks.

For the Budget-Conscious User: The Poco C65 prioritizes affordability without sacrificing core functionality. It offers a large display, decent battery life, and respectable performance for everyday use.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework: Guiding Your Choice

The Xiaomi 11T prioritizes a premium, performance-driven experience. It embodies a design philosophy focused on visual fidelity, seamless interaction, and advanced capabilities.

The Poco C65 champions accessibility and value. Its design philosophy centers around providing essential smartphone features at a budget-friendly price point.

My Choice: The Xiaomi 11T

While the Poco C65 offers great value, I would choose the Xiaomi 11T. As a technology communicator focused on user experience, I'm drawn to its superior display, significantly faster performance, and more capable camera system. The smoother 120Hz AMOLED screen elevates everyday interactions, from browsing to gaming, while the powerful Dimensity 1200 ensures a fluid, lag-free experience. These elements combine to create a more immersive and enjoyable user experience that justifies the price difference for me. While the Poco C65 is a solid budget option, the 11T aligns better with my appreciation for a well-rounded, high-quality user experience. It's a device that not only performs well but also delights the senses.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.