Xiaomi 11T vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 11T
Xiaomi 11T
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date October 5, 2021 May 5, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 111.05 cm³ 104.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 203 g 195 g
Height 164.1 mm 162.1 mm
Width 76.9 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Moonlight White
  • Celestial Blue
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 82.4 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 800 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.02 mAh/cm³ 47.89 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi 11T vs. Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my aim is to help you understand these phones not just through specs, but through the lens of user experience. Let's embark on a comparative journey, weaving narratives around their capabilities and design choices.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi 11TSamsung Galaxy A24 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 12.5 (Android 11) - Highly CustomizableOne UI Core 5 (Android 13) - Clean and SimpleXiaomi offers greater personalization, while Samsung provides a more streamlined, potentially less overwhelming, out-of-box experience.
Interaction Flow120Hz AMOLED Display - Fluid and Responsive90Hz AMOLED Display - Smooth VisualsThe 11T's higher refresh rate delivers a noticeably smoother experience in animations and scrolling, enhancing perceived responsiveness.
AccessibilityStandard Android Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android Accessibility Features + One UI Core EnhancementsBoth offer basic accessibility, but Samsung potentially includes more refined features due to One UI Core.
Design ErgonomicsSlightly heavier (203g)Lighter (195g)The A24 4G could be more comfortable for extended use due to its lighter weight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah. The Xiaomi 11T, with its 108MP main camera and advanced video capabilities (4K@30fps with EIS), empowers Sarah to capture stunningly detailed photos and smooth, stabilized videos of her travels. The dedicated macro lens allows her to explore intricate details of nature. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G, while having a capable 50MP main camera with OIS, focuses on essential photography needs with a simpler camera setup. It caters to users like David, who prioritizes capturing everyday moments with ease and stability, relying on the optically stabilized lens for clear shots.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a tech-savvy user, the Xiaomi 11T's customizable interface and powerful processor offer a playground for exploration. However, a less tech-inclined user might find the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G's cleaner interface and simpler camera system more approachable. The longer software support promised by Samsung (up to Android 17) also benefits users who prioritize long-term usability and security updates.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Xiaomi 11T prioritizes performance and customization. The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G emphasizes ease of use, longer software support, and a more streamlined experience.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G

While the Xiaomi 11T boasts impressive specifications, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G. My decision stems from a user-centered perspective. The A24 4G offers a cleaner, more approachable software experience with the promise of extended software updates, crucial for long-term security and functionality. Its lighter weight enhances daily usability, and while the camera system might not be as feature-rich, it prioritizes stability and ease of use, catering to a broader range of users. In essence, the A24 4G resonates with my philosophy of prioritizing intuitive, inclusive technology design that seamlessly integrates into everyday life. It's a device designed not just with impressive specs, but with the user's experience at its core.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.