Xiaomi 11T vs Samsung Galaxy A04s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Xiaomi 11T
Xiaomi 11T
Xiaomi

General

Launch Date October 5, 2021 September 22, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 111.05 cm³ 114.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.29 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 203 g 195 g
Height 164.1 mm 164.7 mm
Width 76.9 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Moonlight White
  • Celestial Blue
  • Black
  • White
  • Green
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 80.7 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 800 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.02 mAh/cm³ 43.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) Exynos 850 (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G52

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi 11T vs. Samsung Galaxy A04s: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's explore the Xiaomi 11T and Samsung Galaxy A04s through a user-centered lens.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi 11TSamsung Galaxy A04sUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignAMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+PLS LCD, 90Hz refresh rateThe 11T offers a visually richer, smoother, and more responsive experience with vibrant colors and fluid motion.
Interaction FlowFlagship-level processor, faster performanceEntry-level processor, potential for lagThe 11T allows for seamless multitasking and demanding applications, while the A04s might struggle with complex tasks.
AccessibilitySide-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth offer convenient biometric unlocking.
ErgonomicsSleek glass back, slightly heavier (203g)Plastic back, lighter (195g)The 11T feels more premium, but the A04s might be more comfortable for extended use due to its lighter weight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a photographer capturing a fast-moving subject. The 11T's 120Hz AMOLED display allows you to track the subject smoothly through the viewfinder, ensuring you don't miss the perfect shot. Its powerful processor handles image processing quickly, minimizing lag. The A04s' 90Hz refresh rate is good, but the 11T's superior display and processing power provide a clear advantage in dynamic situations.

Scenario: You're a casual gamer. The 11T's Dimensity 1200 chipset and Mali-G77 MC9 GPU deliver a console-like gaming experience on the go, with smooth frame rates and vibrant graphics. The A04s, with its Exynos 850 and Mali-G52, can handle casual games, but might struggle with more demanding titles.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For the tech-savvy user: The 11T offers cutting-edge technology, a premium experience, and the ability to handle demanding tasks.

For the budget-conscious user: The A04s provides essential smartphone functionality at an affordable price point, sacrificing some performance and visual fidelity.

For the user prioritizing battery life: Both phones offer large 5000mAh batteries, but the 11T's faster processor might drain the battery quicker under heavy use. However, the 11T also supports significantly faster charging.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Xiaomi 11T prioritizes performance and a premium user experience with its powerful processor, stunning AMOLED display, and fast charging. The Samsung Galaxy A04s focuses on affordability and essential functionality, making compromises on processing power and display quality.

My Choice: Xiaomi 11T

While the A04s offers excellent value for its price, I would choose the Xiaomi 11T. As someone who values a fluid and responsive user experience, the 11T's 120Hz AMOLED display, powerful processor, and overall design philosophy resonate strongly with me. The superior display significantly enhances everyday interactions, from browsing social media to watching videos and playing games. The performance gap between the two phones is substantial, and for my usage, the smoother operation and future-proofing offered by the 11T outweigh the price difference. The faster charging is also a major benefit in my fast-paced life. While I acknowledge the A04s' budget-friendly appeal, the 11T's user experience advantages make it the clear winner for me.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.