Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE vs Motorola Moto G51 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 2, 2021 December 16, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 82.62 cm³ 118.69 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 4.15 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 158 g 208 g
Height 160.5 mm 170.5 mm
Width 75.7 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 6.8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Peach Pink (Tuscany Coral)
  • Bubblegum Blue (Jazz Blue)
  • Truffle Black (Vinyl Black)
  • Snowflake White (Diamond Dazzle)
  • Indigo Blue
  • Bright Silver
  • Aqua Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.3 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 387 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 99.06 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.44 mAh/cm³ 42.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4250 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 642L Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12 12

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE vs. Motorola Moto G51 5G: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's explore the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE and Motorola Moto G51 5G through the lens of user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEMotorola Moto G51 5GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignAMOLED, 90Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+IPS LCD, 120HzXiaomi offers a visually richer experience with vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Motorola prioritizes a smoother scrolling experience.
Interaction FlowSlimmer (6.8mm), Lighter (158g)Thicker (9.1mm), Heavier (208g)Xiaomi provides a more comfortable one-handed use due to its lightweight and slim profile.
AccessibilitySide-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth offer convenient biometric unlocking.
ErgonomicsSleek, premium design with multiple color optionsMore basic design, fewer color optionsXiaomi's design language caters to a wider range of aesthetic preferences.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine you're a photography enthusiast. The Xiaomi's 64MP camera with a Samsung GW3 sensor allows you to capture detailed shots, even in challenging lighting conditions. Its Dolby Vision enabled AMOLED screen then brings your photos to life with stunning color accuracy. Conversely, the Moto G51's 50MP camera with a Samsung JN1 sensor, while capable, might not offer the same level of detail and dynamic range. Its IPS LCD screen, though boasting a faster refresh rate, displays less vibrant colors.

Scenario: You're a frequent traveler relying on your phone for navigation and entertainment. The Xiaomi's more powerful Snapdragon 778G processor ensures smooth multitasking and quicker app loading, crucial for navigating unfamiliar cities or enjoying graphic-intensive games. The Moto G51's Snapdragon 480+, while efficient, may struggle with demanding tasks, leading to potential frustration. However, the Moto G51's larger 5000mAh battery will likely outlast the Xiaomi's 4250mAh, offering peace of mind on long journeys.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

For users prioritizing visual quality and premium design: The Xiaomi excels with its AMOLED display and sleek aesthetics.

For users valuing battery longevity and affordability: The Moto G51 offers a larger battery and a generally lower price point.

For users seeking a balance between performance and affordability: The Xiaomi's superior processor makes it a stronger contender for smooth everyday performance.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Beyond raw specifications, consider your personal priorities:

  • Visual Experience: Xiaomi for vibrant colors and deep blacks.
  • Performance: Xiaomi for smooth multitasking and gaming.
  • Battery Life: Moto G51 for extended usage.
  • Budget: Moto G51 generally offers a more affordable option.
  • Design Aesthetics: Xiaomi for a more premium look and feel.

My Choice: Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE

While the Moto G51 5G offers a larger battery and a potentially lower price, I would choose the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE. The superior AMOLED display, faster processor (Snapdragon 778G), and sleeker design significantly enhance the overall user experience. For me, the combination of visual richness, smooth performance, and comfortable ergonomics outweighs the benefits of a slightly larger battery. The Xiaomi aligns more closely with my personal preference for a premium, responsive, and visually engaging mobile experience. The difference in battery life can be managed with mindful usage and readily available power banks, while the performance gap would likely impact daily use more significantly.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.