vivo Y76 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 23, 2021 February 23, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 95.82 cm³ 106.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.76 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 175 g 193 g
Height 163.8 mm 168.3 mm
Width 75 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Aurora
  • Midnight Space
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.58 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 460 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 500 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 94.70 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.79 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Phones: vivo Y76 5G vs. Xiaomi Redmi A3

Let's embark on a journey to understand the souls of these two devices, the vivo Y76 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi A3, going beyond the cold, hard numbers to uncover the stories they tell about user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Featurevivo Y76 5GXiaomi Redmi A3User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSleek, modern, rounded edgesFunctional, minimalistY76 offers a more premium aesthetic experience. Redmi A3 prioritizes practicality.
Interaction FlowSmooth, responsiveBasic, may lag with heavy useY76's superior processor ensures a more fluid and enjoyable user experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth offer basic accessibility features, but customization options might vary depending on the Android skin.
Design ErgonomicsSlim, lightweight (175g)Larger, heavier (193g)Y76 offers a more comfortable one-handed usage experience due to its slimmer profile and lighter weight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional, Sarah, who relies on her phone for communication, productivity, and entertainment.

  • Connectivity: With the Y76 5G's robust 5G connectivity, Sarah seamlessly joins video conferences on the go, enjoying crystal-clear audio and video without frustrating buffering. The Redmi A3, limited to 4G, might struggle in areas with weak signal strength, impacting Sarah's productivity.

  • Performance: While editing a presentation on the train, Sarah experiences the smooth multitasking capabilities of the Y76 5G, powered by the Dimensity 700 processor. The Redmi A3's Helio G36, though capable for basic tasks, might stutter under the pressure of demanding applications, increasing Sarah's stress levels.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For the Tech-Savvy: The Y76 5G caters to users who demand performance and future-proof connectivity.
  • For the Budget-Conscious: The Redmi A3 provides essential smartphone functionality at an affordable price point.
  • For the Senior User: Both devices offer standard Android accessibility features, but the Y76 5G's smoother performance might be less frustrating for users less familiar with navigating complex interfaces.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The vivo Y76 5G excels in delivering a premium user experience with its sleek design, powerful performance, and 5G connectivity. The Xiaomi Redmi A3, while offering a more basic experience, prioritizes affordability.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the vivo Y76 5G. While the Redmi A3 presents a compelling value proposition, I prioritize the seamless and enjoyable user experience that the Y76 5G provides. Its superior performance, 5G connectivity, and more refined design align better with my focus on user-centered technology. The smoother interaction flow, faster speeds, and more comfortable handling contribute to a more enjoyable and productive overall user experience, making the higher price a worthwhile investment in the long run. It's not just about having a phone; it's about having a tool that empowers and delights.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.