vivo Y76 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F4 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 23, 2021 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 95.82 cm³ 95.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.76 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 175 g 195 g
Height 163.8 mm 163.2 mm
Width 75 mm 76 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Aurora
  • Midnight Space
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green

Display

Screen Size 6.58 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 460 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 900 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 94.70 mAh/in² 101.15 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.79 mAh/cm³ 47.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4100 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Vivo Y76 5G vs. Xiaomi Poco F4: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's delve into the Vivo Y76 5G and Xiaomi Poco F4, focusing on how their features translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureVivo Y76 5GXiaomi Poco F4User Experience Impact
Interface DesignFuntouch OS (Android 11)MIUI 13 (Android 12/13)MIUI offers greater customization, while Funtouch OS focuses on simplicity. Impact depends on user preference for control vs. ease of use.
DisplayIPS LCDAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Poco F4's AMOLED provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to the 120Hz refresh rate. Significant impact on visual experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android NavigationMIUI specific navigationMIUI's gesture controls and customizations can enhance or complicate navigation depending on user familiarity with the system.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidMIUI Accessibility SuiteMIUI generally offers more comprehensive accessibility features.
Design ErgonomicsLightweight (175g)Slightly heavier (195g)Y76 5G might be more comfortable for extended use due to its lighter weight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: A Day in the Life:

Imagine you're a photographer capturing a vibrant street festival. The Poco F4's superior camera system, with its 64MP Omnivision sensor and optical image stabilization, allows you to capture crisp, detailed photos even in challenging light. Its 960fps slow-motion video lets you highlight intricate moments. Meanwhile, the Y76 5G, while capable, might struggle in low light and lack the artistic flexibility of the Poco F4.

Later, you're reviewing your photos and editing a video on the go. The Poco F4's vibrant AMOLED display brings your content to life, while the 120Hz refresh rate ensures smooth scrolling and editing. The Y76 5G's LCD screen, while adequate, pales in comparison.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: Tech-Savvy Content Creator: The Poco F4's powerful processor, advanced camera, and stunning display cater to their demanding needs.

User 2: Casual User: Both phones offer adequate performance for everyday tasks. The Y76 5G's lighter weight and simpler interface might be preferable for some. However, the Poco F4's superior display elevates even simple tasks like browsing.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Poco F4 prioritizes a premium multimedia experience with its AMOLED display, powerful processor, and advanced camera. The Y76 5G focuses on affordability and ease of use.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F4

While the Vivo Y76 5G offers a decent package, the Poco F4 provides a significantly better user experience due to its:

  • Stunning AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate: This drastically improves visual clarity and smoothness, impacting everything from browsing to gaming and video consumption.
  • Superior Camera System: The 64MP sensor, OIS, and slow-motion capabilities offer greater creative control and capture higher-quality images.
  • More Powerful Processor: Ensuring smoother performance for demanding tasks and future-proofing the device.

Although the Poco F4 is slightly heavier, the benefits in display, camera, and overall performance significantly outweigh the minor difference in weight for me. The Poco F4 embodies a design philosophy focused on delivering a rich, engaging user experience, making it the clear winner in this comparison.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.