vivo Y76 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 23, 2021 May 5, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 95.82 cm³ 104.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.76 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 175 g 195 g
Height 163.8 mm 162.1 mm
Width 75 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Aurora
  • Midnight Space
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red

Display

Screen Size 6.58 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 82.4 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 460 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 94.70 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.79 mAh/cm³ 47.89 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

The vivo Y76 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: A User-Centered Perspective

Let's move beyond the gigabytes and gigahertz and delve into the real-world experience these phones offer. As a technology communications specialist, my focus is on how these devices translate into your daily life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Featurevivo Y76 5GSamsung Galaxy A24 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignFuntouch OS 12 (Android 11)One UI Core 5 (Android 13)Samsung offers a more modern and updated Android experience with potential for longer software support.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigation with vivo tweaksSamsung's refined One UI navigationOne UI generally provides a smoother and more intuitive user experience with customizable features.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsOne UI's extensive accessibility featuresSamsung likely provides a broader range of accessibility features for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsSlim (7.8mm) but potentially slipperySlightly thicker (8.3mm) but potentially grippierWhile the vivo is slimmer, the A24's slightly thicker build could offer a more secure grip. Personal preference plays a role here.
DisplayIPS LCD, 6.58", 401 ppiSuper AMOLED, 6.5", 396 ppi, 90HzSamsung's AMOLED display provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Battery4100 mAh with 44W fast charging5000 mAh with 25W fast chargingSamsung offers a significantly larger battery for longer usage, but vivo boasts faster charging speeds for quicker top-ups.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student rushing between classes, needing to quickly capture notes and stay connected. The vivo Y76 5G's faster charging means a quick power boost during a break can get you through the day. However, the Galaxy A24 4G's vibrant AMOLED screen and smoother scrolling make reading lengthy articles and taking notes a more visually pleasing experience. Its larger battery also provides peace of mind, eliminating battery anxiety during long study sessions.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For users prioritizing speed and connectivity, the vivo Y76 5G offers 5G capability and faster charging. Users focused on visual experience and longer battery life will appreciate the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G's AMOLED display and larger battery capacity. Older adults or those with visual impairments might find the vibrant AMOLED screen of the A24 easier to read.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice boils down to your priorities. If you're a tech enthusiast craving the latest network speeds and quick charging, the vivo Y76 5G caters to that need. If you prioritize a visually immersive experience, longer battery life, and a more up-to-date software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G emerges as the stronger contender.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G. While 5G is enticing, the overall user experience offered by the A24 is more compelling to me. The vibrant Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate significantly enhances everyday interactions, from browsing social media to reading articles. The larger battery capacity alleviates battery anxiety, and the more updated Android OS promises a smoother, feature-rich experience with longer-term software updates. Though the vivo Y76 5G offers faster charging, the A24's combination of display quality, battery life, and software make it the more compelling choice for a user-centric approach. The slightly thicker build also doesn't bother me, and I'd prioritize the potential for a more secure grip.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.