vivo Y76 5G vs Motorola Moto G52 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 23, 2021 April 20, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 95.82 cm³ 95.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.76 "/g 3.91 "/g
Weight 175 g 169 g
Height 163.8 mm 160.1 mm
Width 75 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Aurora
  • Midnight Space
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White

Display

Screen Size 6.58 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 88.2 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 460 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 94.70 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.79 mAh/cm³ 52.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's break down the vivo Y76 5G and the Motorola Moto G52. I'll put on my tech journalist hat and dive deep into the specs, but I'll keep it relatable so you can see what all this tech-talk means in your daily life.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed comparison, focusing on what these specs actually mean for you:

Featurevivo Y76 5GMotorola Moto G52Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.8 × 75 × 7.8 mm160.1 × 74.5 × 8 mmvivo is taller and thinner, Moto is wider and slightly thicker, will be noticed in hand.
Weight175g169gMoto is a bit lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
BuildUnknown ScreenCorning Gorilla Glass 5Moto G52 has superior protection from scratches and breaks.
Display
Size6.58"6.6"Very similar screen sizes, hardly any noticeable difference.
Resolution1080x24081080x2400Sharply detailed text, images, and video on both displays
Pixel Density401 PPI402 PPIDisplay looks clear on both devices, with no pixelation.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDBig difference: Moto has much better colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency in dark mode.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzMoto's screen will feel smoother and more responsive for scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth should be bright enough under normal lighting conditions, but testing would be needed
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 700 (7nm)Snapdragon 680 (6nm)Dimensity 700 offers better raw performance for faster app launching, and smoother multitasking
AnTuTu Score389,300216,000Y76 is significantly faster, better for gaming or any demanding use.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 610Y76 is better suited for graphic-intensive tasks.
Camera
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensor, Samsung S5KJN1, 0.64 µm pixel sizeBoth have similar main cameras, but Moto G52 has a sensor size and pixel size to help with image quality and low-light capabilities.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.016MP, f/2.45, 1.00 µm pixel sizevivo might perform slightly better in low light.
Wide Angle LensN/A8MP, f/2.2Moto is more versatile when taking photos.
Portrait Mode (Depth)2MP, f/2.4N/AY76 has an additional sensor for better depth of field.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both have macro lens for close-up shots.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer standard FHD video recording; Moto G52 has 4K video which gives a higher quality.
FeaturesDigital zoom, EIS, Ultra stable videoDigital zoom, 4K Videovivo offers ultra stable video, Moto has 4K.
Battery Life
Capacity4100mAh5000mAhMoto's larger battery will likely last longer throughout the day.
Charging44W Fast Charging30W Fast Chargingvivo is faster to charge up from zero.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 12Moto has a newer operating system and might have better long-term support.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11ac802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11acSimilar Wi-Fi capabilities.
Bluetooth5.1 LE, A2DP5.0 LE, A2DP, AVRCP, DIP, HFP, HID, HSP, PAN, OPP, PBAP/PAB, HOGP, APT-xMoto has more features but older version; for the average user it will not matter.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoSimilar GPS options.
Storage
Internal128GB or 256 GB64GB, 128GB or 256GBBoth offer similar storage options, but Moto gives you an entry level 64GB choice.
RAM8GB4GB or 6GBvivo offers more RAM, better for multitasking and gaming.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage.
Audio
QualityBasic audio featuresDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesMoto offers a better immersive audio experience.
Security
Featuresside-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth phones offer the same security measures.
Sensors
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, GravityBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeSimilar sensor suite, vivo offers gravity.

2. Key Insights

  • vivo Y76 5G:

    • Strengths: Significantly more powerful processor, more RAM, faster charging, and slightly better selfie camera aperture.
    • Competitive Advantages: Ideal for users who need speed and smooth multitasking, good performance for gaming, also fast charging will be great for busy people.
    • Trade-offs: IPS LCD screen isn't as visually appealing as AMOLED. The phone is also a bit taller and lacks screen protection.
  • Motorola Moto G52:

    • Strengths: Superior AMOLED display, larger battery, better audio features, a wide angle camera, and newer software, and great screen protection.
    • Competitive Advantages: Perfect for media consumption, offering a better viewing experience with its AMOLED screen and better audio, as well as good battery life, making it great for all-day usage.
    • Trade-offs: Weaker processor compared to the vivo Y76 5G.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • vivo Y76 5G:
    • Ideal User: Gamers, power users, and anyone who needs a snappy, fast phone. Those who don't mind a slight reduction in display quality but want high performance.
    • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, heavy multitasking, app-heavy usage.
  • Motorola Moto G52:
    • Ideal User: People who love watching videos, listening to music, and want good battery life. This phone is good for those who value a high-quality display and better sound over raw speed.
    • Use Cases: Binge-watching shows, media consumption, daily communication, and social media browsing.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to consider:

  1. Performance or Display Quality? If raw speed and performance is your priority, go for the vivo. If you favor a visually superior screen with vibrant colors and deep blacks, the Moto is your pick.
  2. Battery Life or Charging Speed? Do you need a phone that lasts all day on a single charge (Moto) or are you more concerned with quickly topping it up if needed (vivo)?
  3. Are you a Photo Enthusiast? If you value the most versatile camera system and low light pictures, the Motorola is a great pick, if you care more about selfies and have your photos printed out, the vivo might be a better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The Gamer: Choose the vivo Y76 5G for its raw processing power and smooth gaming experience.
  • The Media Binger: Choose the Motorola Moto G52 for its stunning AMOLED screen, better sound system, and good battery life.
  • The Everyday User: If you do a mix of things, consider where you fall. If speed is your primary concern, go for the vivo. If you want a nicer display and overall good battery life, the Moto will do the trick.

Final Choice

If I were choosing between these two, I would go with the Motorola Moto G52.

While the vivo Y76 5G has the clear advantage in terms of performance, the overall package of the Moto G52 is more appealing to me. The AMOLED display is a significant plus for the immersive media consumption experience I value. The larger battery also means I don't have to worry as much about running out of power during a busy day.

I value a good display and immersive audio experience over pure performance because I use my phone for a lot of media consumption, not heavy gaming. Also, the Moto has an actual screen protection while the vivo doesn't. The newer OS is an extra plus. For my personal use cases, the trade-off in performance is worth it.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.