vivo Y76 5G vs HTC U23 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 23, 2021 May 18, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 95.82 cm³ 114.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.76 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 175 g 205 g
Height 163.8 mm 166.6 mm
Width 75 mm 77.1 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Aurora
  • Midnight Space
  • Snow White
  • Coffee Black

Display

Screen Size 6.58 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84.4 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 460 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 94.70 mAh/in² 102.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.79 mAh/cm³ 40.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4100 mAh 4600 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 3.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG USB Type-C 3.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive deep into the specs of the vivo Y76 5G and the HTC U23 Pro. These two phones, while both aiming for the mid-range market, have distinct personalities and strengths. Let's break it down, tech-style.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Featurevivo Y76 5GHTC U23 ProReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.8 × 75 × 7.8 mm166.6 × 77.1 × 8.9 mmThe HTC is larger and thicker, likely feeling more substantial but slightly less pocketable. The vivo Y76 5G feels more compact and lighter.
Weight175g205gThe vivo is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. The HTC feels denser and slightly more premium.
Display
Size6.58"6.7"The HTC's display is marginally larger, offering a bit more screen real estate, which some people like.
Resolution1080x24081080x2400Both are virtually identical. The difference is basically negligible.
PPI401393Both have similar pixel densities, so the visual sharpness of both will be hard to tell apart.
TechnologyIPS LCDOLEDOLED provides better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors than LCD. The HTC is likely to provide a superior viewing experience.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzThe HTC's 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling and animations feel smoother and more fluid than the vivo's 60Hz. It's a key factor for a modern, responsive feel.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness data is missing. We will have to evaluate this in a real-world test.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)The Snapdragon is built on a more advanced process (4nm vs 7nm), generally resulting in better performance and power efficiency.
AnTuTu Score389,300699,600The HTC dramatically outperforms the vivo. The HTC is going to be noticeably faster in daily use and gaming.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 644The Adreno GPU in the HTC will provide better graphics processing, especially useful for graphically intensive tasks such as gaming or video editing.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8108MP, f/1.7HTC has a significantly higher resolution main camera, which might allow for better detail and flexibility, particularly in good lighting conditions. The wider aperture can also help in low light.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.032MP, f/2.45HTC offers higher resolution selfie camera, but the vivo has a wider aperture for low-light shots.
Wide Angle LensN/A8MP, f/2.4The HTC includes a wide-angle camera; this gives it a much needed versatile edge in shooting environments that demand it.
Portrait Mode2MP, f/2.45MP, f/2.2HTC has higher resolution and slightly wider aperture for portrait shots.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both are evenly matched here.
Video Recording1080p@30fps with EIS; No; Slow-motion: No4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@30fps; Yes; Slow-motion: YesHTC offers superior video recording capability with 4K resolution and slow motion at 120fps; this will provide crisp video quality. HTC includes video stabilization and it doesn't look like the vivo does.
Battery Life
Capacity4100mAh4600mAhThe HTC has a larger battery, which should result in longer usage times between charges.
Charging44W fast charging, Li-Polymer30W fast charging, LithiumThe vivo's fast charging is quicker than the HTC's, even though it has the smaller battery.
Wireless ChargingN/A15W wireless, 5W reverse wirelessHTC includes the convenience of wireless charging, which the vivo does not offer. Also, it can charge other devices wirelessly.
Other
Operating SystemAndroid 11Android 13HTC comes with a newer version of Android, which means new features and better app compatibility.
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6The HTC supports the newer Wi-Fi 6 standard, offering faster speeds and better performance on compatible networks.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1Bluetooth 5.2The HTC has a slightly newer version of Bluetooth which should be more stable and more power-efficient.
Storage128 GB or 256 GB256 GBBoth phones offer a max storage of 256 GB, but the HTC doesn't offer a lower 128GB variant
RAM8 GB8 GB or 12 GBThe HTC has an option for a higher 12GB of RAM, making it more suitable for heavy multitasking and gaming.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage; users need to plan ahead if they plan to store a lot of media.
Build Quality & ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusThe HTC benefits from the more premium glass protection.
SecuritySide-mounted FingerprintSide-mounted FingerprintBoth include a common security standard

2. Key Insights

vivo Y76 5G:

  • Strengths: Lighter and more compact design, making it easier to handle. It has faster wired charging than the HTC U23 Pro.
  • Competitive Advantages: It's a budget-friendly option that still gives you a decent performance and a large screen.
  • Trade-offs: Older chipset and less advanced display technology when compared to the HTC U23 Pro. The camera system is also less versatile.
  • Limitations: The lack of a wide-angle camera and a slower refresh rate means the user might not be getting the best viewing experience compared to other similarly priced devices.

HTC U23 Pro:

  • Strengths: Superior OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, significantly more powerful processor, larger battery with wireless charging, and a more versatile camera system with 4K video.
  • Competitive Advantages: Provides a premium experience with a high refresh rate display and a higher level of performance. It includes features like wireless and reverse wireless charging, along with a wide-angle camera and better video recording.
  • Trade-offs: Heavier and bulkier design, and slower wired charging.
  • Limitations: The slightly slower wired charging and the lack of expandable storage may be an issue for some users. It comes at a premium price compared to the vivo.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • vivo Y76 5G:
    • Best For: Users who prioritize a light and compact design, basic smartphone functionality, and who are on a tight budget.
    • Use Cases: Casual browsing, social media, video consumption, and basic photography. This phone is for those who want something simple and reliable.
  • HTC U23 Pro:
    • Best For: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, superior camera versatility, and a more premium experience.
    • Use Cases: Gaming, content creation, photography, and for those who want a reliable smartphone for all their daily tasks. This phone is for those who want a more premium user experience.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help users decide:

  1. How much do I value display quality and smooth animations? If you spend a lot of time on your phone, the HTC’s OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate is a significant upgrade.
  2. Is performance a key factor? If you are a gamer or a power user, the HTC's superior processor and RAM options will be more satisfying.
  3. Do I need advanced camera features? If so, the HTC’s wider array of lenses and high-quality video capabilities make it the better option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget User: If you are on a strict budget and only need basic smartphone functions, the vivo Y76 5G is a more affordable choice.
  • Casual User: For everyday use with a mix of social media, web browsing, and occasional photography, both phones will serve you well. However, the HTC provides better quality overall.
  • Power User: If you require peak performance, a high-quality display, and the best camera features, the HTC U23 Pro is the clear winner.
  • Content Creators: With the 4K video and versatile lens system, the HTC U23 Pro caters better to content creators.

What I Would Choose

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would definitely pick the HTC U23 Pro. Yes, it’s a bit bulkier and comes with a higher price tag. But for my needs, the upgrade in display quality with the OLED panel and 120Hz refresh rate is a huge benefit that I would use constantly. The much more powerful processor and graphics performance mean I can expect it to run smoother, for longer, and give me a future-proof experience. The camera versatility, with the addition of a wide-angle lens, is also a big win. I'm also happy about the wireless charging.

While the faster wired charging in the vivo Y76 5G is appealing, the overall benefits of the HTC make it a clear choice.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.