vivo X100 vs Xiaomi Poco M6 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date November 21, 2023 June 13, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.89 cm³ 106.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.36 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 202 g 205 g
Height 164.1 mm 168.6 mm
Width 75.2 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.79 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 452 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 550 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 109.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.67 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5030 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Vivo X100 vs. Xiaomi Poco M6 4G: A Holistic Technological Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis goes beyond simple spec comparisons to provide a holistic understanding of the Vivo X100 and Xiaomi Poco M6 4G within the broader mobile landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureVivo X100Xiaomi Poco M6 4GTechnological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Launch Date2023-11-212024-06-13Indicates market positioning and potential access to latest software/hardware advancements.ModerateModerateLowModerate
Price RangeMediumLowReflects target audience and expected feature set.LowHighLowHigh
Display6.78" LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak)6.79" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 550 nits (HBM)AMOLED offers superior contrast, color accuracy, and power efficiency; LTPO enables variable refresh rate for battery saving.HighHighHighHigh
Resolution1260x28001080x2460Higher resolution contributes to sharper visuals.ModerateModerateModerateHigh
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300 (4nm)Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12nm)Node size (nm) impacts power efficiency and performance; Dimensity 9300 signifies a higher-end, newer chipset.HighHighHighHigh
CPUOcta-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & ...)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & ...)Core configuration and clock speed influence processing power.HighModerateHighHigh
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Mali-G52 MC2GPU performance is crucial for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.HighModerateHighHigh
RAM/Storage256GB/16GB, 512GB/16GB256GB/8GBRAM capacity impacts multitasking; Storage options cater to varying user needs.ModerateModerateModerateModerate
Battery5000mAh5030mAhBattery capacity indicates potential usage time.LowLowLowModerate
OSAndroid 14Android 14Latest Android version ensures access to new features and security updates.LowHighLowHigh
Camera (Not Provided)N/AN/ACamera technology is a key differentiator in the modern smartphone market. Lack of this information hinders full analysis.HighHighN/AHigh

2. Strategic Technological Insights

The Vivo X100 embodies a push towards premium mobile experiences with its advanced display, powerful chipset, and ample RAM. The Dimensity 9300 positions it for demanding tasks and future-proofs it for upcoming software advancements. Conversely, the Poco M6 4G prioritizes affordability, leveraging a capable but less powerful chipset and focusing on essential features.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

The X100 aligns with users seeking high performance, vibrant visuals, and a feature-rich experience, likely integrated into a broader ecosystem of premium devices and services. The Poco M6 4G caters to budget-conscious users who prioritize core functionality and value over cutting-edge technology. It suggests integration with a more cost-effective ecosystem.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

While the Poco M6 4G offers excellent value, the X100's superior hardware, particularly the Dimensity 9300 and the AMOLED display, positions it for a longer lifespan with sustained performance and a more engaging user experience over time.

My Choice: Vivo X100

Although the Poco M6 4G is a compelling budget option, I would choose the Vivo X100. The superior display technology, significantly more powerful processor, and larger RAM capacity offer a substantially better user experience and greater longevity. The price difference is justified by the future-proofing provided by the advanced hardware, ensuring a smoother and more enjoyable experience for years to come. The investment in the X100 translates to a device that can handle demanding tasks, adapt to evolving software requirements, and provide a visually richer experience, ultimately delivering greater value over its lifespan. The lack of camera specifications makes a completely informed decision impossible, but based on the available data, the X100 is the clear winner.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.