vivo X100 vs Xiaomi Poco F6 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date November 21, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.89 cm³ 95.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.36 "/g 3.73 "/g
Weight 202 g 179 g
Height 164.1 mm 160.5 mm
Width 75.2 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black
  • Black
  • Green
  • Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 452 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 2400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.67 mAh/cm³ 52.27 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Vivo X100 vs. Xiaomi Poco F6: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis transcends a simple spec comparison. I aim to provide a holistic understanding of the vivo X100 and Xiaomi Poco F6, placing them within the broader technological landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureVivo X100Xiaomi Poco F6Technological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Launch Date2023-11-212024-05-23Release date proximity indicates competitive positioning within the same market cycle.LowMediumLowLow
Display6.78" LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 nits6.67" AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 2400 nitsDisplay technology advancements are crucial for user engagement. Higher peak brightness suggests better outdoor visibility.MediumHighMediumHigh
Resolution1260x28001220x2712Resolution impacts visual clarity and content consumption experience.LowHighLowMedium
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300 (4nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Chipset choice reflects performance targets and power efficiency strategies. Both utilize advanced 4nm fabrication.HighHighHighHigh
CPUOcta-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & ...)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & ...)CPU architecture influences processing power and multitasking capabilities. Subtle core clock differences require benchmarking.MediumHighHighHigh
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Adreno 735GPU performance is critical for gaming and graphically demanding applications.MediumHighHighHigh
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity is a key user concern, directly impacting usage time.LowMediumLowHigh
OSAndroid 14Android 14 (up to 17)OS version and update policy significantly affect long-term user experience and security. Poco F6's longer support is notable.MediumHighMediumHigh
Camera (not provided)N/AN/ACamera technology is a major differentiator in the smartphone market. Lack of data prevents in-depth comparative analysis.HighHighN/AHigh
Price RangeMediumMediumPrice positioning relative to features determines market competitiveness.LowMediumLowHigh

2. Strategic Technological Insights

Both devices represent a strong mid-range offering with a focus on performance and display quality. The vivo X100 leans into MediaTek's latest Dimensity chipset, showcasing a commitment to exploring alternative silicon providers. The Poco F6, while using a slightly older Snapdragon chipset, benefits from potential longer software support and boasts superior video recording capabilities according to provided specifications. The trend towards brighter displays is evident in both, improving outdoor usability.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices cater to users invested in the Android ecosystem. The choice between them hinges on specific priorities. Users prioritizing cutting-edge hardware might lean towards the X100's Dimensity 9300. Those valuing software longevity and potentially video recording might prefer the Poco F6.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

The rapid pace of mobile innovation necessitates a forward-looking perspective. While both phones offer compelling features today, the Poco F6's extended Android OS update commitment might translate to a longer lifespan and greater value in the long run. Furthermore, the explicit mention of video capabilities for the Poco F6 suggests a targeted user base interested in content creation.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6

While the vivo X100 boasts a slightly newer chipset and brighter display, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F6. The deciding factors are the longer software support (up to Android 17) and the emphasis on video recording capabilities. In a rapidly evolving technological landscape, software updates are crucial for both security and sustained performance. The Poco F6's commitment to longer-term updates aligns with a more sustainable and future-proof approach to device ownership. Additionally, the specific mention of video recording features suggests a more deliberate focus on content creation, catering to a specific user need. This targeted functionality, combined with the long-term software support, makes the Poco F6 a more compelling choice for my needs.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.