vivo X100 vs vivo V30 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo
vivo V30
vivo V30
Vivo

General

Launch Date November 21, 2023 March 4, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.89 cm³ 92.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.36 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 202 g 186 g
Height 164.1 mm 164.4 mm
Width 75.2 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black
  • Bloom White
  • Waving Aqua
  • Lush Green
  • Noble Black

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 452 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 2800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.67 mAh/cm³ 54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Vivo X100 vs. Vivo V30: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis of the Vivo X100 and Vivo V30 transcends a simple specification comparison. I aim to provide a holistic understanding of these devices within the broader mobile technology landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureVivo X100Vivo V30Technological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Launch Date2023-11-212024-03-04Indicates market positioning and potential access to newer software features.LowLowLowLow
Display6.78" LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak)6.78" AMOLED, 120Hz, 2800 nits (peak)LTPO offers dynamic refresh rate adjustment for power efficiency. Higher peak brightness enhances outdoor visibility.MediumMediumMediumHigh
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300 (4nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm)Chipset dictates processing power, efficiency, and feature support. Dimensity 9300 generally benchmarks higher in CPU and GPU performance.HighHighHighHigh
CPUOcta-core (Cortex-X4 & Cortex-A720)Octa-core (Cortex-A715 & Cortex-A510)Core architecture impacts performance and power efficiency.HighHighHighMedium
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Adreno 720GPU performance crucial for gaming and graphically demanding tasks. Immortalis-G720 MC12 provides a significant performance advantage.HighMediumHighHigh
RAM/Storage256GB/16GB, 512GB/16GB256GB/8GBRAM influences multitasking, while storage dictates capacity. Vivo X100 offers more RAM, crucial for demanding applications.MediumLowHighHigh
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity directly impacts usage time.LowLowMediumHigh
OSAndroid 14Android 14 (up to 16)Indicates software features and potential for future updates. Vivo V30 has a longer confirmed update cycle.MediumHighMediumHigh
Camera (Not Provided)N/AN/ACamera technology is a critical differentiator in the mobile market. This missing data prevents comprehensive analysis.N/AN/AN/AN/A
Price RangeMediumMediumIndicates target market segment and value proposition.LowLowLowLow

2. Strategic Technological Insights

Both devices represent a strong mid-range offering, but the Vivo X100 showcases a more aggressive approach to performance with its Dimensity 9300 chipset and higher RAM configurations. The V30 focuses on longer software support and potentially better power efficiency thanks to the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. The prevalence of 120Hz AMOLED displays signifies the industry's commitment to smooth user experiences.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices cater to users invested in the Android ecosystem. The choice between them hinges on individual priorities. Power users and gamers will gravitate towards the X100, while those seeking longevity and potentially better battery life might prefer the V30.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

The rapid pace of mobile innovation demands a forward-looking perspective. While the X100 offers immediate performance advantages, the V30's confirmed Android 16 update pathway suggests a longer lifespan within the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. The lack of camera specifications hinders a complete analysis, as camera technology is a key differentiator in the current market.

My Choice: Vivo X100 (Tentatively)

Based on the available data, I lean towards the Vivo X100. The Dimensity 9300's significant performance advantage, coupled with the higher RAM options, aligns with my preference for a device capable of handling demanding tasks and multitasking efficiently. However, this choice is tentative due to the missing camera information. A comprehensive camera comparison is crucial for a well-informed decision, as camera performance is a paramount factor in my mobile device selection. If the V30 boasts superior camera capabilities, it could easily sway my decision. Furthermore, a deeper investigation into real-world battery performance and thermal management of the Dimensity 9300 is warranted.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.