vivo X100 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date November 21, 2023 October 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.89 cm³ 100.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.36 "/g 3.15 "/g
Weight 202 g 213 g
Height 164.1 mm 162 mm
Width 75.2 mm 77.3 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 88 %
Pixel Density 452 PPI 385 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 1900 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.67 mAh/cm³ 46.92 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) Exynos 2400e (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz)
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Xclipse 940

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Vivo X100 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis of the Vivo X100 and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE transcends a simple spec comparison. I aim to provide a holistic understanding of each device within the broader technological ecosystem, anticipating future trends and user needs.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureVivo X100Samsung Galaxy S24 FETechnological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Display6.78" LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak)6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, 1900 nitsDisplay technology advancements focus on brightness, refresh rates, and power efficiency.ModerateHighHighExcellent
Resolution1260x28001080x2340Higher resolution impacts visual clarity and content consumption experience.LowMediumMediumGood
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300 (4nm)Exynos 2400e (4nm)Chipset advancements drive processing power, graphics capabilities, and AI functionalities.HighMediumHighExcellent
CPUOcta-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & ...)10-core (1x3.1 GHz + ...)CPU architecture influences multi-tasking performance and power management.HighMediumHighExcellent
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Xclipse 940GPU advancements are critical for gaming, graphic-intensive applications, and AR/VR experiences.HighMediumHighExcellent
Battery5000 mAh4700 mAhBattery capacity and charging speed are crucial for mobile device usability.ModerateHighHighExcellent
OSAndroid 14Android 14OS updates and customization options influence user experience and security.LowHighMediumGood
Camera (not provided)N/AN/ACamera technology is a major differentiator, focusing on image quality, low-light performance.HighHighN/AN/A
Price RangeMediumMediumPrice positioning reflects target market and perceived value proposition.N/AN/AN/AN/A

2. Strategic Technological Insights

Both devices leverage advanced chipsets manufactured using a 4nm process, indicating a focus on performance and efficiency. The Vivo X100's Dimensity 9300 boasts a potentially more powerful CPU configuration, while the Exynos 2400e in the S24 FE might offer specific advantages in other areas like AI processing, depending on its final configuration. The Vivo's higher resolution display suggests a premium visual experience, while the Samsung's Dynamic AMOLED 2X potentially offers better color accuracy and contrast.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices operate within the Android ecosystem, offering access to a vast app library and services. Samsung's deeper integration with its own ecosystem of devices and services (e.g., Galaxy Watch, Samsung Pay) might appeal to users already invested in that platform. Vivo, on the other hand, might attract users seeking a potentially more performance-focused device with a strong emphasis on visual experience.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

While both devices represent compelling offerings, the choice depends on individual priorities. The Vivo X100's potential performance advantage and superior display resolution position it as a strong contender for users prioritizing raw power and visual fidelity. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, backed by Samsung's established ecosystem and potentially stronger camera capabilities (assuming it aligns with previous FE models), offers a more well-rounded experience.

My Choice:

I would choose the Vivo X100. The combination of the potentially more powerful Dimensity 9300 chipset and the incredibly bright and sharp display appeals to my preference for a device that excels in performance and visual clarity. While Samsung's ecosystem is attractive, I prioritize cutting-edge hardware and the potential for a premium visual experience. The higher resolution and brightness of the X100's display are particularly compelling for media consumption and productivity. Furthermore, the slightly larger battery capacity in the Vivo X100 suggests better longevity, which is a crucial factor for me.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.