vivo X100 vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date November 21, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.89 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.36 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 202 g 197 g
Height 164.1 mm 161 mm
Width 75.2 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 452 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.67 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Phones: vivo X100 vs. Samsung Galaxy A25

Let's embark on a journey to explore two intriguing devices, not as mere spec sheets, but as companions in our daily lives: the vivo X100 and the Samsung Galaxy A25. Both reside in the "medium price" realm, promising a blend of performance and affordability, but their personalities differ significantly.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Featurevivo X100Samsung Galaxy A25User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSleek, minimalist, potentially more complexFamiliar Samsung One UI, potentially simplerX100 might offer a steeper learning curve but potentially more customization. A25 offers wider familiarity.
Interaction FlowPotentially smoother due to Dimensity 9300Potentially good, but dependent on Exynos 1280X100 likely provides a more responsive experience, especially in demanding tasks.
AccessibilityUnder-display fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorPersonal preference; side-mounted can be easier for some to reach.
ErgonomicsSlimmer (8.5mm) and slightly lighter (202g)Slightly thicker (8.3mm) and heavier (197g)X100 might feel more premium and comfortable for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine a budding photographer, Sarah. The vivo X100, with its superior Dimensity 9300 processor and potential for advanced camera features (not detailed in specs but hinted at by the launch date and model number), becomes her creative canvas. Its brighter, sharper LTPO AMOLED display brings her photos to life with vibrant colors and incredible detail, even under direct sunlight. The 3000 nits peak brightness ensures she can review her shots even on the brightest beach.

Now picture David, a college student. The Samsung Galaxy A25, with its reliable Exynos 1280 processor and confirmed 4K video recording capability, allows him to seamlessly document lectures and create engaging video projects. The familiar One UI provides a comfortable and intuitive user experience, allowing him to focus on his studies rather than navigating a new interface.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a tech-savvy user seeking cutting-edge performance and a potentially more sophisticated experience, the vivo X100 beckons. However, for someone prioritizing familiarity, ease of use, and reliable video recording, the Samsung Galaxy A25 presents a strong case. The difference in RAM (16GB on X100 vs 8GB on A25) could significantly impact multitasking performance, favoring power users leaning towards the X100.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these phones isn't about picking the "best" specs, but about finding the best fit. The vivo X100 whispers of innovation and premium design, while the Samsung Galaxy A25 offers dependable functionality and a user-friendly experience.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the vivo X100. While the provided specifications lack camera details, the combination of the powerful Dimensity 9300 processor, stunning LTPO AMOLED display with exceptional brightness, and sleek design speaks to my appreciation for a premium, responsive, and visually engaging user experience. The larger RAM also suggests a smoother multitasking experience, crucial for my work. While the Samsung A25 is a solid contender, the X100's potential for innovation and superior display technology aligns more closely with my personal preferences and professional needs.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.