vivo X100 vs Realme 12 Pro+ - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date November 21, 2023 January 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.89 cm³ 105.17 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.36 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 202 g 196 g
Height 164.1 mm 161.5 mm
Width 75.2 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black
  • Submarine Blue
  • Navigator Beige
  • Explorer Red

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 90.4 %
Pixel Density 452 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.67 mAh/cm³ 47.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Vivo X100 vs. Realme 12 Pro+: A Holistic Technological Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis of the Vivo X100 and Realme 12 Pro+ extends beyond a simple spec comparison. I aim to provide a holistic understanding of each device, placing them within the broader technological landscape and anticipating future implications.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureVivo X100Realme 12 Pro+Technological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Launch Date2023-11-212024-01-29Indicates market timing and potential access to latest software/hardware advancements.
Display6.78" LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 3000 nits (peak)6.7" AMOLED, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak)LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate, saving power. Higher peak brightness enhances outdoor visibility.ModerateHighHighHigh
Resolution1260x28001080x2412Higher resolution offers sharper visuals.LowHighModerateHigh
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)Chipset dictates processing power, efficiency, and feature support. 4nm signifies advanced manufacturing.HighHighHighHigh
CPUOcta-core (Cortex-X4 & Cortex-A720)Octa-core (Cortex-A78 & Cortex-A55)Core architecture influences performance and power efficiency.HighModerateHighHigh
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Adreno 710GPU performance crucial for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.HighModerateHighHigh
RAM/Storage256GB/16GB, 512GB/16GB256GB/8GBRAM impacts multitasking; storage affects file capacity.LowModerateModerateModerate
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity influences usage time.LowHighComparableComparable
Camera (Main)Not ProvidedNot ProvidedCamera technology is a key differentiator in the mobile market.N/AN/AN/AN/A
OSAndroid 14Android 14OS version determines features and security updates.LowHighComparableComparable
Price RangeMediumMediumPrice positioning indicates target market and value proposition.

2. Strategic Technological Insights

  • Performance Leadership: Both devices utilize advanced 4nm chipsets, highlighting the industry trend toward powerful and efficient mobile computing. The Dimensity 9300 in the Vivo X100, with its newer Cortex-X4 cores, is poised to offer a performance edge in demanding tasks.
  • Display Innovation: The Vivo X100's LTPO AMOLED display with a higher peak brightness indicates a focus on premium user experience. LTPO's dynamic refresh rate optimization contributes to power efficiency, a crucial factor in mobile device design.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices cater to users seeking high-performance experiences within a mid-range budget. The Vivo X100, with its potentially superior processing power and display technology, might appeal to users prioritizing demanding applications and vibrant visuals. The Realme 12 Pro+ offers a competitive alternative with a strong feature set.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

  • Sustained Performance: The choice of advanced chipsets positions both devices for long-term relevance in the face of evolving software demands.
  • Evolving Display Technologies: The Vivo X100's LTPO adoption signals a move towards more power-efficient and responsive displays, a trend likely to continue in future mobile iterations.

My Choice: Vivo X100

While both devices offer compelling features, I would choose the Vivo X100. The Dimensity 9300's potential performance advantage, coupled with the superior LTPO display with a significantly brighter peak brightness, aligns more closely with my preference for a future-proof device capable of handling demanding tasks and offering a premium visual experience. The slightly larger screen size and higher resolution further contribute to this decision. While RAM configurations may vary, the core advantages in processing and display technology make the Vivo X100 a more compelling choice for my needs. Furthermore, the Vivo X100 boasts a more sophisticated color sensor, enhancing its photography capabilities.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.