vivo X100 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 21, 2023 January 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 109.97 cm³ 98.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.07 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 221 g 188.5 g
Height 164.1 mm 162.3 mm
Width 75.3 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Sunset Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black
  • Midnight Black
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Ocean Sunset

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 452 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.47 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.1 mAh/cm³ 50.94 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5400 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version 15 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Featurevivo X100 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9162.3 x 75.6 x 8.0X100 Pro slightly taller and thicker, Redmi Note 13 slightly narrower. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)221188.5Redmi Note 13 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsMissingMissingCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLEDX100 Pro's LTPO panel allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery. Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Size (inches)6.786.67Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1260 x 28001080 x 2400X100 Pro significantly sharper due to higher pixel density (452 ppi vs 395 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)30001800X100 Pro dramatically brighter, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility even in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)Dimensity 9300 significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)Dimensity 9300's newer architecture and higher clock speeds offer a substantial performance advantage.
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Adreno 610Immortalis-G720 significantly more powerful, delivering superior gaming and graphics performance.
RAM/Storage256GB/16GB128GB/8GB RAM, 256GB/8GB RAMX100 Pro offers more RAM, benefiting heavy multitasking. Both offer ample storage options.
Camera
Rear CameraMissing detailed specsMissing detailed specsCannot compare camera quality and features.
Video Recording8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps1080p@30fpsX100 Pro capable of significantly higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)54005000X100 Pro has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life. Real-world usage will vary.

2. Key Differences Analysis

vivo X100 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Dimensity 9300 and ample RAM provide a superior performance experience for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Brighter and sharper display: Offers better outdoor visibility and a more detailed viewing experience.
  • Higher resolution video recording: Enables capturing more detailed videos.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Advantages:

  • Lighter weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Potentially lower price: While both are mid-range, the Redmi Note 13 is likely more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

vivo X100 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a premium display, and high-quality video recording. Suitable for demanding tasks, gaming, and content creation.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G: Suitable for users who prioritize affordability and a lightweight design. Best for everyday tasks, web browsing, social media, and casual gaming. Good for users sensitive to phone weight.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi Note 13 4G likely offers better value for budget-conscious buyers.
  2. What are your primary use cases? The X100 Pro excels in demanding tasks and gaming, while the Redmi Note 13 is sufficient for everyday use.
  3. Do you prioritize display quality and performance or affordability and lightweight design?

My Choice: vivo X100 Pro

While lacking specific camera details hinders a full assessment, the vivo X100 Pro's superior performance, stunning display, and advanced video capabilities make it the more compelling device for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming. The brighter display is crucial for outdoor use, and the higher resolution offers a noticeable improvement in clarity. While the Redmi Note 13 4G is a solid budget option, the X100 Pro's advantages outweigh the slight difference in weight and potential price premium. The potential for longer battery life due to the LTPO display is also a significant factor. I am willing to pay more for the significant jump in performance and display quality.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.