vivo X100 Pro vs Nothing Phone (2a) Plus - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 21, 2023 August 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 109.97 cm³ 104.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.07 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 221 g 190 g
Height 164.1 mm 161.7 mm
Width 75.3 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Sunset Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black
  • Black
  • Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 87.6 %
Pixel Density 452 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1100 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.47 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.1 mAh/cm³ 47.68 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5400 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Mali-G610 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 15 17

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Phones: vivo X100 Pro vs. Nothing Phone (2a) Plus

As a technology communications specialist, my mission is to guide you through the labyrinth of specifications and unveil the true essence of these two intriguing devices: the vivo X100 Pro and the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus. Let's embark on a narrative-driven analysis, focusing on the user experience rather than just the cold, hard numbers.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Featurevivo X100 ProNothing Phone (2a) PlusUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignRefined, potentially featuring custom UIClean, near-stock Android with Glyph Interfacevivo might offer more customization, while Nothing prioritizes a minimalist approach with its unique Glyph lighting system. Personal preference reigns here.
Interaction FlowLikely smooth, given the powerful chipsetGenerally smooth, but potentially less responsiveThe Dimensity 9300 in the vivo promises a more fluid experience, especially for demanding tasks.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsStandard Android accessibility optionsBoth should offer similar accessibility features, but custom UI overlays can sometimes impact usability.
Design ErgonomicsSlightly heavier, curved displayLighter, flat displayThe Nothing Phone (2a) Plus might feel more comfortable for one-handed use due to its lighter weight and flat display. The vivo's curved display can be polarizing.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah, capturing the vibrant sunset over a bustling cityscape.

  • vivo X100 Pro: Sarah effortlessly frames the scene, the 3000 nits peak brightness of the LTPO AMOLED display ensuring perfect visibility even under direct sunlight. The Dimensity 9300 processor coupled with advanced camera features allows her to capture stunning 8K video with impressive stabilization, preserving the magic of the moment.

  • Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: Sarah appreciates the minimalist design of the Phone (2a) Plus and the unique Glyph Interface, which subtly alerts her to notifications without interrupting her creative flow. While the camera capabilities are respectable, shooting 4K video, they might not offer the same level of professional-grade features as the vivo.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Power User: A demanding user who values performance and cutting-edge features would likely gravitate towards the vivo X100 Pro, thanks to its superior processing power and camera capabilities.

  • Casual User: Someone prioritizing simplicity and a clean user experience might prefer the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus, valuing its minimalist design and unique Glyph Interface.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice boils down to individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Performance and Camera Prowess: Choose the vivo X100 Pro.
  • Prioritize Unique Design and Minimalist Experience: Choose the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus.

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the vivo X100 Pro. While I appreciate the minimalist aesthetic of the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus, I prioritize a fluid, powerful user experience, especially for creative tasks like photography and videography. The vivo's superior processor, brighter display, and advanced camera features resonate with my need for a device that can keep up with my demanding workflow and allow me to capture life's moments in stunning detail. The potential for custom UI also appeals to my desire for a personalized digital experience. The slight weight difference is a minor trade-off for the significant performance gains.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.