vivo X100 Pro vs Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 21, 2023 August 22, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 109.97 cm³ 106 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.07 "/g 3.08 "/g
Weight 221 g 221 g
Height 164.1 mm 162.8 mm
Width 75.3 mm 76.6 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Sunset Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Porcelain
  • Rose Quartz

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1344 x 2992
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.8 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 452 PPI 486 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.47 mAh/in² 109.43 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.1 mAh/cm³ 47.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5400 mAh 5060 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Immortalis-G720 MC12 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 3.2 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 15 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Featurevivo X100 ProGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XLPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.1x75.3x8.9mm162.8x76.6x8.5mmPixel slightly shorter and thinner, potentially easier to hold for some. Vivo slightly narrower.
Weight221g221gIdentical weight.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedUnable to compare build durability and premium feel.
Display
Size6.78"6.8"Negligible size difference.
TypeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO OLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy and power efficiency. Practical differences likely minimal. AMOLED generally offers higher brightness and contrast.
Resolution1260x28001344x2992Pixel has slightly higher resolution, resulting in marginally sharper text and images. Difference unlikely noticeable in everyday use.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness3000 nits3000 nitsIdentical peak brightness, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 9300 (4nm)Google Tensor G4 (4nm)Both are high-end chipsets built on a 4nm process, promising excellent performance. Dimensity 9300 boasts a potentially more powerful CPU configuration. Real-world performance needs testing.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)Dimensity 9300 might offer a performance advantage in demanding tasks due to higher clock speeds on performance cores.
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Mali-G715 MC7Immortalis-G720 generally considered more powerful, potentially leading to better gaming performance. Real-world gaming performance needs testing.
RAM16GB16GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking and smooth operation.
Storage256GB256GB/512GB/1TBPixel offers more storage options for users with high storage demands.
Battery
Capacity5400 mAh5060 mAhVivo has a larger battery, potentially leading to longer battery life. Real-world usage will vary.
Software
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both launch with the latest Android version.
OS Max Version1521Pixel guaranteed longer software updates and security patches, a significant advantage.
CameraDetailed camera specs (sensor size, aperture) are missing, making a thorough comparison impossible. Video capabilities suggest both phones offer high-quality video recording options.
Video Capabilities8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@ up to 240fpsPixel offers a wider range of video recording frame rates and resolutions, catering to more advanced videography needs.

2. Key Differences Analysis

vivo X100 Pro Advantages:

  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger 5400mAh battery.
  • Potentially Faster Performance: Dimensity 9300 with potentially superior CPU and GPU.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Advantages:

  • Guaranteed Long-Term Software Support: OS updates up to Android 21.
  • More Storage Options: Up to 1TB storage available.
  • More Versatile Video Recording: Wider range of frame rates and resolutions.
  • Slightly More Compact Design: Marginally thinner and shorter.
  • More Comprehensive Sensors: Includes barometer and skin temperature sensor.

Trade-offs:

  • Vivo: Shorter software support lifespan. Limited storage option.
  • Pixel: Smaller battery capacity, potentially shorter battery life. Higher price range.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

vivo X100 Pro: Users prioritizing performance, potentially longer battery life, and a lower price point. Suitable for demanding tasks, gaming, and extended use without charging.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: Users valuing long-term software updates, ample storage, versatile camera features, and a slightly more compact design. Ideal for users who keep their phones for several years, require ample storage, and prioritize camera functionality.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How long do you typically keep your phone? (Prioritize Pixel if longer than 2-3 years due to software updates.)
  2. What's your budget? (Vivo offers a lower price point.)
  3. What are your primary use cases? (Gaming/demanding tasks favor Vivo's potential performance; Long-term use, photography/videography favor Pixel.)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget-conscious gamer: vivo X100 Pro
  • Photographer seeking long-term software updates: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • Average user who replaces phones every 2 years: Either phone could be suitable depending on specific priorities.

My Choice: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

While the Vivo X100 Pro boasts potentially better performance and battery life, the significantly longer software support, more versatile video recording capabilities, and larger storage options of the Pixel 9 Pro XL outweigh those advantages for me. The peace of mind knowing my phone will receive security updates and new features for years to come is crucial. The Pixel's slightly more compact form factor is also appealing. While price is a factor, the long-term value proposition of the Pixel, in my opinion, justifies the higher cost. This choice reflects my personal priorities; a user prioritizing raw performance and lower price might prefer the Vivo.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.