vivo V30 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo V30
vivo V30
Vivo

General

Launch Date March 4, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 92.6 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.65 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 186 g 189 g
Height 164.4 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.1 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Bloom White
  • Waving Aqua
  • Lush Green
  • Noble Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 453 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 720 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the vivo V30 and ZTE Blade A75 4G, moving beyond mere specs to understand their impact on your daily life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

Featurevivo V30ZTE Blade A75 4GUser Experience Impact
Display6.78" AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2800 nits (peak)6.6" IPS LCD, 90HzV30: Vibrant, smooth, and incredibly bright for excellent outdoor visibility. A75: Decent but less impressive.
Resolution1260x2800 (453 ppi)720x1612 (267 ppi)V30: Sharper, more detailed visuals. A75: Noticeably less sharp, impacting clarity.
PerformanceSnapdragon 7 Gen 3Unisoc T606V30: Significantly faster and more powerful for demanding tasks and gaming. A75: Suitable for basic use.
OS & UpdatesAndroid 14, upgradable to 16Android 13, limited update informationV30: Longer software support, ensuring latest features and security patches. A75: Uncertain future updates.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedV30: Modern, integrated design. A75: Functional but less aesthetically pleasing.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer (7.5mm)Thicker (8.6mm)V30: More comfortable to hold and carry. A75: Bulkier feel.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine you're scrolling through your social media feed on a sunny afternoon. With the V30's dazzling AMOLED display and peak brightness of 2800 nits, you can effortlessly see every detail, even under direct sunlight. The A75's LCD struggles in this scenario, forcing you to squint and seek shade.

Now, picture yourself editing a short video. The V30's powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor handles this task with ease, allowing for smooth transitions and quick rendering. The A75, with its less powerful processor, lags and stutters, making the process frustrating.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For users who prioritize visual clarity and a smooth user experience, the V30 is the clear winner. Its superior display, powerful processor, and long-term software support cater to a wide range of users, including those who engage in demanding tasks like gaming or video editing. The A75, while more budget-friendly, is better suited for users with basic needs who primarily use their phones for calling, texting, and light browsing.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The vivo V30 embodies a design philosophy focused on delivering a premium, immersive user experience. The ZTE Blade A75 prioritizes affordability, compromising on certain aspects of design and performance.

My Choice:

I would choose the vivo V30. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a budget-friendly option, the V30's superior display, significantly better performance, longer software update commitment, and more refined design create a vastly more enjoyable and future-proof user experience. The investment in the V30 translates to a more satisfying daily interaction, making it a worthwhile choice for me. The smoother performance, vibrant visuals, and confidence in long-term support outweigh the price difference. In my role, I prioritize user experience, and the V30 delivers a demonstrably better one.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.