vivo V30 vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo V30
vivo V30
Vivo

General

Launch Date March 4, 2024 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 92.6 cm³ 95.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.65 "/g 3.6 "/g
Weight 186 g 186 g
Height 164.4 mm 161.2 mm
Width 75.1 mm 72.4 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Bloom White
  • Waving Aqua
  • Lush Green
  • Noble Black
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Luxe Lavender
  • Black Beauty
  • Moonlight Pearl

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 92.8 %
Pixel Density 453 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 2800 nits 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 720 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Featurevivo V30Motorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5 mm161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mmEdge 50 Pro is slightly shorter, narrower, but thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight186g186gIdentical weight.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials unknown, hindering comprehensive comparison.
Display
Size6.78"6.7"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120HzP-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+Both offer vibrant colors and HDR. Edge 50 Pro's 144Hz offers smoother animations but might consume more battery. V30 uses AMOLED, while Edge 50 Pro uses P-OLED; practical differences, if any, are generally minimal for average users.
Resolution1260 x 28001220x2712Very similar pixel density, resulting in comparable sharpness.
Peak Brightness2800 nits2000 nitsV30 significantly brighter outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm)Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm)Identical chipsets indicating similar performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.63 GHz A715 & 3x2.4 GHz A715 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz A715 & 4x2.4 GHz A715 & 3x1.8 GHz A510)Minor core configuration difference; unlikely to noticeably impact real-world performance.
GPUAdreno 720Adreno 720Identical GPUs indicating similar gaming performance.
RAM8GB12GBEdge 50 Pro offers better multitasking and future-proofing.
Storage256GB256GB/512GBEdge 50 Pro offers a 512GB option for users needing more storage.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4500 mAhV30 likely to offer longer battery life.
ChargingNot specifiedNot specifiedCharging speeds unknown, hindering battery performance comparison.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedInsufficient information to compare camera quality and features.
Video4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30fps (EIS)4K@30fps (HDR, EIS), 1080p@ various fps (HDR, EIS)Edge 50 Pro offers more video recording options and HDR video.
Software
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both launch with the latest Android version.
OS UpdatesUp to Android 16Up to Android 17Edge 50 Pro will receive longer software support.
Other
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4Edge 50 Pro offers faster data transfer and video output via USB.

2. Key Differences Analysis

vivo V30 Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: Significantly brighter for better outdoor visibility.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.

Motorola Edge 50 Pro Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 144Hz refresh rate for more fluid animations.
  • More RAM: Better multitasking and future-proofing.
  • More Storage Options: 512GB option for users needing ample space.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates to a later Android version.
  • More Video Recording Options: Including HDR and higher frame rates.
  • Faster Data Transfer: USB 3.1 for quicker file transfers.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

vivo V30: Users prioritizing outdoor visibility and long battery life.

Motorola Edge 50 Pro: Users prioritizing smooth performance, multitasking, ample storage, longer software updates, and versatile video recording. Gamers might prefer the higher refresh rate.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is outdoor visibility? V30 excels here.
  2. How much do you value smooth scrolling and gaming performance? Edge 50 Pro's 144Hz and larger RAM are advantageous.
  3. How long do you plan to keep your phone? Edge 50 Pro offers longer software updates.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Pro

While the vivo V30 boasts a brighter display and larger battery, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro offers a more well-rounded package. The 144Hz refresh rate, larger RAM, and longer software support are significant advantages for long-term usability. The additional storage option and more versatile video recording capabilities further solidify its appeal. While lacking information on camera quality and charging speeds makes a fully informed decision challenging, the available data points to the Edge 50 Pro being a more future-proof and feature-rich device for my needs. The slightly thicker body is a minor trade-off for the substantial benefits it offers.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.