vivo V30 vs Google Pixel 9 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo V30
vivo V30
Vivo

General

Launch Date March 4, 2024 August 22, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 92.6 cm³ 93.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.65 "/g 3.18 "/g
Weight 186 g 198 g
Height 164.4 mm 152.8 mm
Width 75.1 mm 72 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Bloom White
  • Waving Aqua
  • Lush Green
  • Noble Black
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Wintergreen
  • Peony

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2424
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.9 % 86.5 %
Pixel Density 453 PPI 422 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits 1800 nits
Peak Brightness 2800 nits 2700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 118.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 720 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Featurevivo V30Google Pixel 9Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5 mm152.8 x 72 x 8.5 mmPixel 9 is noticeably smaller and might be more comfortable for one-handed use. V30 is taller and thinner.
Weight186g198gPixel 9 is slightly heavier.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Size6.78"6.3"V30 offers a larger screen for media consumption, but Pixel 9 is more pocketable.
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120HzOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Both offer smooth scrolling and vivid colors. The 1B colors on the V30 might offer slightly smoother color gradients but would be barely noticeable to the average user.
Resolution1260 x 28001080 x 2424V30 has a sharper display (453 ppi vs 422 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Peak Brightness2800 nits2700 nitsBoth offer excellent outdoor visibility. V30 has a slightly higher peak brightness.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 3Google Tensor G4Tensor G4 is likely optimized for AI and machine learning tasks. Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is a well-rounded performer. Performance differences depend on specific workloads.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)Pixel 9 likely has a performance advantage due to the Cortex-X4 core and higher clock speeds.
GPUAdreno 720Mali-G715 MC7Gaming performance likely favors the Pixel 9 due to better CPU and potentially GPU. Real-world gaming tests are needed for definitive comparison.
RAM8GB12GBPixel 9 having more RAM enables better multitasking and app retention.
Storage256GB256GBStorage capacity is identical.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare camera quality and features.
Video4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30fps (EIS)4K@24/30/60fps (HDR, OIS, EIS), 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps (HDR, OIS, EIS)Pixel 9 offers significantly more video recording options, including higher resolutions, frame rates, and stabilization features (OIS).
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4700 mAhV30 has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life. Real-world usage will vary.

2. Key Differences Analysis

vivo V30 Advantages:

  • Larger, sharper display: Better for media consumption.
  • Potentially longer battery life: Due to larger battery capacity.

Google Pixel 9 Advantages:

  • More powerful processor and more RAM: Better for demanding tasks and multitasking.
  • Significantly more versatile video recording capabilities.
  • Smaller form factor: Easier to handle and pocket.
  • Longer software support: Expected updates up to Android 21.

Trade-offs:

  • V30: Larger size might be less comfortable for some users.
  • Pixel 9: Smaller battery capacity might result in shorter battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

vivo V30: Ideal for users who prioritize media consumption, battery life, and a large display.

Google Pixel 9: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, camera features (specifically video), and a compact form factor, along with the assurance of long-term software updates.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What screen size do you prefer? Large screen for media or a smaller, more pocketable device?
  2. What is your priority: Performance or Battery life? Demanding tasks/gaming vs longer usage between charges.
  3. How important is software update longevity?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy media consumer: vivo V30
  • Power user/Gamer: Google Pixel 9
  • User who values software updates and compact size: Google Pixel 9

My Choice: Google Pixel 9

While the vivo V30 offers a compelling larger display and potentially longer battery life, the Google Pixel 9's superior performance, more versatile video capabilities, and longer software support make it the better overall choice for me. The compact form factor is also appealing. The potential trade-off in battery life is acceptable considering the performance gains and the fact that battery life is heavily influenced by usage patterns. The significantly better video recording capabilities of the Pixel 9 are a major deciding factor, as is the promise of longer-term software updates from Google.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.