vivo iQOO 12 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 14, 2023 January 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 100.33 cm³ 98.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 198.5 g 188.5 g
Height 163.2 mm 162.3 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)
  • Midnight Black
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Ocean Sunset

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.6 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 453 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1400 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.83 mAh/cm³ 50.94 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 750 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version 16 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Featurevivo iQOO 12Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1162.3 x 75.6 x 8.0Virtually identical in size and feel.
Weight (g)198.5188.5iQOO 12 is noticeably heavier. May impact one-handed use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colorsAMOLEDiQOO 12 offers superior color accuracy and potentially better power efficiency with LTPO.
Size (inches)6.786.67Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1260 x 28001080 x 2400iQOO 12 has a significantly sharper display, noticeable in text clarity and image detail.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120iQOO 12 provides smoother scrolling and animations, especially in games.
Peak Brightness (nits)30001800iQOO 12 is drastically brighter, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)Snapdragon 685 (6nm)iQOO 12 boasts a flagship-level processor, resulting in significantly faster performance in demanding tasks and games.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)iQOO 12's CPU offers superior performance in multi-tasking and demanding applications.
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 610iQOO 12 will provide a much better gaming experience with higher frame rates and detail.
RAM/Storage512GB/16GB, 1TB/16GB128GB/8GB, 256GB/8GBiQOO 12 offers significantly more RAM and storage for smoother multitasking and ample file storage.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCamera quality cannot be compared due to missing specifications.
Video Capabilities8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, ...1080p@30fpsiQOO 12 offers substantially better video recording capabilities with higher resolutions and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

vivo iQOO 12 Advantages:

  • Significantly higher performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a massive leap in processing power compared to the Snapdragon 685.
  • Superior display: Sharper resolution, higher refresh rate, brighter panel, and better color accuracy enhance the visual experience.
  • More RAM and storage: Enables smoother multitasking and ample space for apps and files.
  • Advanced video recording: Supports higher resolutions and frame rates.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Advantages:

  • Lighter weight: More comfortable for extended one-handed use.
  • Potentially lower price: Likely more budget-friendly given the lower-end specifications.

Trade-offs: The iQOO 12's superior performance and display come at the cost of higher weight and potentially higher price. The Redmi Note 13 4G prioritizes affordability and lighter weight, sacrificing performance and display quality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

vivo iQOO 12: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize a premium visual experience. Excellent for demanding tasks, content creation, and high-end gaming.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G: Suitable for budget-conscious users with basic needs like web browsing, social media, and casual photography. A good option for those seeking a lightweight and affordable device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The iQOO 12 will likely be more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and demanding tasks benefit from the iQOO 12's power.
  3. Do you prioritize display quality and performance or affordability and lightweight design?

My Choice: vivo iQOO 12

While lacking some specifics like camera details, the vivo iQOO 12 is clearly the superior device based on the available information. The substantial performance difference, the vastly improved display, and the greater RAM/storage options make it a compelling choice for my needs. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for tasks like gaming and multitasking, making the iQOO 12's powerful hardware a decisive factor. The added weight is a minor trade-off for the significant performance gains. While the Redmi Note 13 4G offers a more budget-friendly option, the compromises in performance and display are too significant for me to consider. I am willing to invest in a device that offers a premium and future-proof experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.