vivo iQOO 12 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 14, 2023 February 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 100.33 cm³ 106.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 198.5 g 193 g
Height 163.2 mm 168.3 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.6 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 453 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1400 nits 500 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.83 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 750 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Featurevivo iQOO 12Xiaomi Redmi A3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm168.3 x 76.3 x 8.3 mmThe iQOO 12 is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight198.5 g193 gNegligible weight difference in practical use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedMaterial differences could impact durability and premium feel; information lacking.
Display
Display TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144HzIPS LCD, 90HziQOO 12 offers superior contrast, color accuracy, smoother scrolling, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO.
Resolution1260 x 2800720 x 1650Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the iQOO 12.
Refresh Rate144Hz90HzSmoother animations and transitions on the iQOO 12, especially noticeable in gaming and scrolling.
Peak Brightness3000 nits500 nitsiQOO 12 will be vastly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)Helio G36 (12nm)The iQOO 12 will offer significantly faster performance, better multitasking, and smoother gaming due to a vastly more powerful chipset.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)iQOO 12 boasts significantly faster CPU cores, resulting in a much smoother and responsive user experience.
GPUAdreno 750PowerVR GE8320Much more powerful GPU in the iQOO 12, enabling high-end gaming and demanding graphical tasks.
RAM/Storage512GB/16GB, 1TB/16GB128GB/4GB, 128GB/6GBiQOO 12 provides considerably more RAM and storage for smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and ample space for files.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare camera quality without detailed specifications.
Video8K@30fps, up to 1080p@240fps1080p@30fpsiQOO 12 offers significantly higher video resolution and frame rate options.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, but real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and display efficiency.

2. Key Differences Analysis

vivo iQOO 12 Advantages:

  • Flagship Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and more RAM.
  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, refresh rate, brighter, and AMOLED technology.
  • Advanced Video Capabilities: 8K recording and higher frame rates.

Xiaomi Redmi A3 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Positioned in the low price range.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Lower resolution display and less powerful processor might result in longer battery life, though this is not guaranteed.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

vivo iQOO 12: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and advanced features like high-resolution video recording. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking.

Xiaomi Redmi A3: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Not recommended for demanding tasks or users who value a premium display experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The iQOO 12 is a significantly more expensive device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For basic tasks, the Redmi A3 might suffice. For demanding tasks, the iQOO 12 is necessary.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The iQOO 12 offers a dramatically better display and performance.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: iQOO 12
  • Casual User: Redmi A3
  • Photographer/Videographer: iQOO 12 (assuming its camera specs are competitive, which cannot be determined from the provided data)

My Choice: vivo iQOO 12

While I lack camera details for the iQOO 12, its clear superiority in performance, display quality, and overall feature set makes it the compelling choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with the high refresh rate AMOLED screen, promises a fluid and engaging user experience. While the Redmi A3 offers a budget-friendly option, the compromises in performance and display are substantial. For my needs, which likely include multitasking, content consumption, and occasional gaming, the iQOO 12's advantages significantly outweigh the price difference. The Redmi A3 feels like a device aimed at extremely budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality above all else.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.