vivo iQOO 12 vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 14, 2023 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 100.33 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 198.5 g 180 g
Height 163.2 mm 161.5 mm
Width 75.9 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.6 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 453 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1400 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.83 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 750 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

vivo iQOO 12 vs. Oppo Reno12 Pro: A Holistic Technological Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis goes beyond simple spec comparisons to provide a holistic understanding of the vivo iQOO 12 and Oppo Reno12 Pro within the broader mobile technology landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

Featurevivo iQOO 12Oppo Reno12 ProTechnological ContextStrategic Category
Launch Date2023-11-142024-06-18Release timing influences market positioning and adoption of latest technologies.Ecosystem Integration
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)Chipset choice dictates performance, power efficiency, and feature support. Snapdragon generally leads in raw performance, while MediaTek focuses on efficiency and value.Performance Metrics
CPUOcta-core (Cortex-X4, A720, A520)Octa-core (Cortex-A78, A55)CPU architecture impacts processing power and multi-tasking capabilities. The iQOO 12's newer Cortex-X4 core signifies a substantial performance advantage.Performance Metrics
GPUAdreno 750Mali-G615 MC2GPU determines graphics rendering capabilities, crucial for gaming and multimedia. Adreno 750 generally outperforms the Mali-G615.Performance Metrics
Display6.78" LTPO AMOLED, 144Hz, 3000 nits peak6.7" AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits peakDisplay technology impacts visual quality, power consumption, and responsiveness. LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, optimizing battery life. The iQOO 12's significantly higher peak brightness offers better outdoor visibility.User Experience Indicators
RAM/Storage16GB/512GB, 16GB/1TB12GB/512GBRAM and storage capacity influence multitasking, app loading speeds, and data storage. The iQOO 12 offers more RAM and a 1TB storage option.Performance Metrics
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhBattery capacity indicates potential usage time. Both offer similar capacities, but real-world performance depends on optimization and power consumption of other components.User Experience Indicators
Camera (Video)8K@30fps, 4K@60fps4K@30fps, 720p@960fpsVideo capabilities cater to content creation needs. iQOO 12 offers higher resolution recording (8K), while Reno12 Pro prioritizes high frame rate slow-motion (960fps).User Experience Indicators/ Innovation Potential

2. Strategic Technological Insights

The iQOO 12 embodies a performance-centric approach, leveraging the latest Snapdragon chipset, higher RAM, superior display technology, and leading video resolution capabilities. It targets users demanding top-tier performance for gaming, multimedia, and productivity. The Reno12 Pro, while powerful, focuses on a balanced approach, offering good performance with a potentially lower price point. Its strength lies in features like high frame rate slow-motion video recording.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

The iQOO 12, with its cutting-edge specifications, aligns with the power user ecosystem—individuals who prioritize performance and are willing to invest in the latest technology. The Reno12 Pro caters to a broader audience seeking a premium experience without necessarily needing the absolute highest performance.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the iQOO 12 offers greater future-proofing, ensuring compatibility with emerging technologies and software updates for a longer period. The Reno12 Pro’s emphasis on specific features like slow-motion video might appeal to specific content creators, but its overall performance potential might plateau sooner.

My Choice: vivo iQOO 12

While both are excellent devices, I would choose the vivo iQOO 12. Its superior processing power, advanced display technology (LTPO, higher brightness), and larger RAM capacity position it for a longer lifespan of optimal performance. The inclusion of 8K video recording, albeit niche for most users currently, reflects a forward-looking approach to content creation. Although the Reno12 Pro boasts impressive slow-motion capabilities and a potentially more attractive price, the iQOO 12's substantial performance advantage and future-proof specifications align better with my needs as a technology researcher who values sustained high performance and the ability to explore emerging mobile technologies.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.