vivo iQOO 12 vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 14, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 100.33 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 198.5 g 174.9 g
Height 163.2 mm 161.9 mm
Width 75.9 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1260 x 2800 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.6 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 453 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1400 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.77 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.83 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Adreno 750 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Featurevivo iQOO 12Motorola Edge 50 FusionPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mmThe Motorola is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially offering a better one-handed grip.
Weight198.5 g174.9 gThe Motorola is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size6.78"6.7"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeLTPO AMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery.
Resolution1260 x 28001080 x 2400The iQOO 12 has a sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate144Hz120/144Hz (Region Dependent)Both offer smooth scrolling and animations; the iQOO 12 may provide a slightly smoother experience at its peak refresh rate but the difference is minor.
Peak Brightness3000 nits1600 nitsThe iQOO 12 is significantly brighter, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3Snapdragon 7s Gen 2The 8 Gen 3 in the iQOO 12 offers significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)The iQOO 12's CPU is more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 710The iQOO 12's GPU provides a substantial advantage in graphics performance, crucial for high-end gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM/Storage512GB/16GB, 1TB/16GB256GB/8GBThe iQOO 12 offers significantly more RAM and storage, enabling smoother multitasking and ample space for apps and files.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, although real-world usage will vary based on other factors.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsThe iQOO 12 can record video at a higher resolution (8K). Detailed camera sensor specifications are missing, making a comprehensive camera comparison impossible.

2. Key Differences Analysis

vivo iQOO 12 Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and higher RAM offer a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper and brighter display: Higher resolution and peak brightness provide a superior visual experience.
  • More storage options: Caters to users who need ample space for apps, media, and files.
  • Higher resolution video recording: Enables capturing more detailed videos.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Advantages:

  • Lighter and slightly smaller: Potentially more comfortable for one-handed use and extended periods.
  • Potentially longer software support: The Motorola might receive Android updates for a longer period, although this is not confirmed.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

vivo iQOO 12: Ideal for power users, gamers, and those who prioritize performance, a sharp display, and ample storage. Excellent for demanding tasks, multitasking, and high-end mobile gaming.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Suitable for users who prioritize a lightweight and comfortable phone for everyday use, including web browsing, social media, and casual gaming. A good option for those seeking a balance between performance and affordability.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The iQOO 12 is likely more expensive.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? (Gaming, productivity, social media, etc.)
  3. Do you prioritize performance or portability/comfort?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy gamer: vivo iQOO 12
  • Budget-conscious user with moderate needs: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
  • User prioritizing the best possible display: vivo iQOO 12

My Choice: vivo iQOO 12

While the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion offers a lighter and more compact design, the vivo iQOO 12's superior performance, significantly better display, and larger storage options make it the more compelling choice for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming. The brighter, sharper display of the iQOO 12 is also a significant factor, as I often use my phone outdoors. The weight difference, while noticeable, is not a deal-breaker considering the substantial performance gains.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.