Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 7, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.43 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio N/A 3.49 "/g
Weight 0 g 189 g
Height 163.7 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.6 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.6 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 267 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.98 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Tecno Spark Go 2024 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureTecno Spark Go 2024ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmVirtually identical in size and feel.
Weight0 g (Data Missing)189 gZTE's weight suggests a more substantial build, but Tecno's missing data prevents a firm conclusion.
Display
Size6.6"6.6"Same screen real estate for media consumption and multitasking.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzSimilar visual quality and smooth scrolling experience.
Resolution720 x 1612720 x 1612Identical sharpness and clarity.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606Unisoc T606Identical processing power, expect comparable performance in apps and games.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Same CPU architecture and clock speeds, indicating similar performance capabilities.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 MP1Same graphics performance, expect similar gaming capabilities.
RAM4GB4GBSame amount of memory for multitasking; performance should be comparable.
Storage128GB256GBZTE offers double the storage, allowing for more apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery life, expecting a full day of moderate use from both.
Other Features
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both run the latest Android version, offering similar software features.
NFCNoYesZTE offers NFC for contactless payments and data transfer – a significant advantage.
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0Both have modern USB-C ports; Tecno supports On-The-Go for connecting peripherals.
SensorsAccelerometer, Fingerprint (side)Accelerometer, Proximity, Fingerprint (side)ZTE includes a proximity sensor for automatic screen off during calls.
Price RangeMediumLowZTE positions itself as a more budget-friendly option.

2. Key Insights

Both phones are remarkably similar in core specifications, leveraging the same chipset, display, and battery capacity. The ZTE Blade A75 4G differentiates itself with double the storage and the inclusion of NFC, a feature increasingly crucial for mobile payments and device pairing. The Tecno Spark Go 2024 counters with OTG support, handy for connecting external drives or peripherals. The most significant differentiator is the price. While performance will be nearly identical, ZTE provides more storage and NFC at a lower price point.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Tecno Spark Go 2024: This phone suits users who prioritize OTG functionality over NFC and are comfortable with less storage. This might include students needing to transfer files between devices or those who frequently use their phone with external hardware.

  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: This phone is a strong contender for budget-conscious users who value ample storage and NFC functionality for contactless payments. It's an excellent choice for everyday users who need a reliable device without breaking the bank.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is NFC a must-have? If contactless payments and easy pairing with other NFC-enabled devices are essential, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is the clear winner.
  2. How important is storage space? If you anticipate needing a lot of space for apps, photos, and videos, the 256GB offered by the ZTE is a significant advantage.
  3. What's your budget? The ZTE Blade A75 4G provides greater value with its lower price point, given the extra storage and NFC capability.

My Choice: ZTE Blade A75 4G

While the Tecno Spark Go 2024 offers OTG support, the ZTE Blade A75 4G provides a more compelling overall package. The combination of double the storage, NFC functionality, and a lower price point makes it the more practical and appealing choice for most users. The value proposition of the ZTE Blade A75 4G is hard to ignore. While the missing weight information for the Spark Go 2024 is concerning, even if it were lighter, the added features of the ZTE still make it the preferable option in my opinion.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.