Tecno Spark 10 Pro vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 22, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.79 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 208 g 189 g
Height 168.4 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.2 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Starry Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.39 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTecno Spark 10 ProZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Spark 10 Pro is slightly taller and wider but marginally thinner. Negligible difference in real-world usage.
Weight (g)208189Blade A75 4G is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use and portability.
Display
Size (inches)6.86.6Spark 10 Pro offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 2460720 x 1612Spark 10 Pro has a significantly sharper display (396 ppi vs 267 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, expecting similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Both chipsets target budget-oriented phones. Helio G88 generally benchmarks slightly higher in CPU performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Spark 10 Pro has a slight CPU clock speed advantage, potentially leading to faster app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MP1While the G57 is a newer generation, the MC2 configuration in the Spark might offer better performance in some scenarios. Direct comparison is difficult without benchmarks.
RAM (GB)84/8 (Variant Dependent)8GB RAM on the Spark 10 Pro will enable smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding apps compared to the 4GB A75 variant.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Similar megapixel count doesn't guarantee equal image quality. Sensor size, aperture, and software processing play crucial roles. Information on these aspects is lacking.
Selfie Camera (MP)328Spark 10 Pro boasts a much higher resolution selfie camera, likely producing significantly better selfies.
Video Recording1440p@30fps1080p@30fpsSpark 10 Pro can record video at a higher resolution.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have the same battery capacity, expected similar battery life depending on usage.
Fast Charging18W22.5WBlade A75 4G supports slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Tecno Spark 10 Pro Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Significantly higher resolution for a clearer viewing experience.
  • Potentially Better Performance: Slightly faster CPU and possibly better GPU performance depending on workload.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Much better for video calls and self-portraits.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Enables capturing more detailed videos.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lighter Design: Noticeably lighter for easier handling.
  • Faster Charging: Quicker battery top-ups.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option (assuming similar storage configurations). More GNSS options for potentially improved location accuracy.

Trade-offs:

  • The Blade A75 4G sacrifices display sharpness, performance, and camera quality for a lighter weight and lower price.
  • The Spark 10 Pro is slightly heavier and more expensive but provides a better multimedia experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Tecno Spark 10 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera capabilities for social media, content consumption, and casual gaming.
  • Use Cases: Watching videos, playing games, taking photos and selfies, browsing the web, social media.

ZTE Blade A75 4G:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who primarily need a phone for basic communication, web browsing, and light app usage. Users who value a lightweight phone.
  • Use Cases: Calling, texting, checking emails, light social media browsing, basic navigation.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Blade A75 4G is the more affordable option.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? If you consume lots of media or play games, the Spark 10 Pro's superior display and performance are crucial.
  3. How important is camera quality to you? The Spark 10 Pro offers a much better selfie camera and higher resolution video recording.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Balanced Budget, Media Consumption and Casual Gaming: Tecno Spark 10 Pro

My Choice: Tecno Spark 10 Pro

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a tempting price, the significantly better display and performance of the Tecno Spark 10 Pro are more important to me. The superior selfie camera and higher resolution video recording capabilities further solidify my choice. I am willing to pay the slight price premium and carry the marginally heavier weight for the enhanced user experience the Spark 10 Pro provides in terms of media consumption, gaming, and overall responsiveness. The sharper display alone makes a huge difference in daily usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.