Tecno Spark 10 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 22, 2023 April 11, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 107.79 cm³ 101.21 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 208 g 201.8 g
Height 168.4 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.2 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Starry Black
  • Polar White
  • Graphite Gray
  • Star Blue
  • Ice blue

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 86 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 700 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1100 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.39 mAh/cm³ 49.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 618

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 11
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTecno Spark 10 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1Redmi is slightly smaller and may feel more comfortable in hand.
Weight (g)208201.8Negligible weight difference.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDAMOLED offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Redmi's 120Hz display provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Dolby VisionNoYesRedmi offers better HDR video playback quality.
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specified1200Redmi's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight. Missing spec for Spark limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm)Snapdragon 732G generally offers better performance and efficiency due to its more advanced manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver)Redmi's CPU architecture likely delivers superior performance in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 618Redmi's GPU is expected to provide a significantly better gaming experience.
RAM (GB)88Both phones offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50108Redmi boasts a higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail.
Sensor TypeCMOSSamsung S5KHM2 ISOCELLRedmi's sensor specifics suggest potentially better low-light performance. Missing details for Spark limit in-depth comparison.
Video Recording1440p@30fps4K@30fpsRedmi allows for higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005020Negligible difference in battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)1867Redmi offers significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Tecno Spark 10 Pro Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While price isn't specified in the data, Tecno phones generally target a more budget-conscious market.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate and Dolby Vision provides a more visually appealing and responsive experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 732G and Adreno 618 offer a noticeable performance advantage for gaming and demanding tasks.
  • Faster Charging: 67W fast charging drastically reduces charging times.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 108MP sensor potentially captures more detail. More detailed sensor information suggests better overall camera performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Tecno Spark 10 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic smartphone functionality.
  • Use Cases: Casual web browsing, social media, light gaming, calling, and texting.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a well-rounded phone with a great display, good performance, and fast charging.
  • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, media consumption, photography, multitasking, and users who value a premium display.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Tecno Spark 10 Pro is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For demanding tasks, the Redmi is superior. For basic use, the Spark may suffice.
  3. How important is display quality? The Redmi's AMOLED display is a major differentiator.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Use: Tecno Spark 10 Pro
  • Balanced Performance and Price: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
  • Prioritizing Gaming and Media: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G

Reasons:

The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G offers a significantly better user experience due to its superior display, performance, and faster charging. While the Tecno Spark 10 Pro might be cheaper, the Redmi's advantages in key areas like performance, display quality, and charging speed are crucial for a satisfying long-term user experience. The improved camera capabilities, backed by specific sensor details, also contribute to making the Redmi a more compelling choice. The slightly smaller dimensions of the Redmi are also more appealing for comfortable one-handed use. Even if the Redmi comes at a price premium, the enhancements justify the investment for a more enjoyable and versatile smartphone experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.