Tecno Spark 10 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 22, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.79 cm³ 98.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 208 g 209 g
Height 168.4 mm 160.9 mm
Width 76.2 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Starry Black
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 89 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 526 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.39 mAh/cm³ 50.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTecno Spark 10 ProXiaomi Poco F6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4160.9 x 75 x 8.2Poco F6 Pro is slightly smaller and may feel more comfortable in hand.
Weight (g)208209Negligible weight difference.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials unknown, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 90HzAMOLED, 120HzPoco F6 Pro offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED technology and higher refresh rate.
Size (inches)6.86.67Tecno offers a slightly larger screen, but the difference is minimal.
Resolution1080 x 24601440 x 3200Poco F6 Pro boasts significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution.
BrightnessNot specifiedUp to 4000 nits peakPoco F6 Pro's much higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight. Missing peak brightness for Spark 10 Pro limits comparison.
HDRNoHDR10+, Dolby VisionPoco F6 Pro supports HDR content for a wider dynamic range and richer colors in compatible media.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm)Poco F6 Pro offers vastly superior performance and efficiency due to a flagship-level processor.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz X3 & 2x2.8 GHz A715 & 2x2.8 GHz A710 & 3x2.0 GHz A510)Poco F6 Pro's CPU architecture provides significantly faster processing speeds for demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 740Poco F6 Pro's GPU provides a substantial leap in graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM8GB12GB/16GBPoco F6 Pro offers more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MP (Omnivision OV50E) with OISSensor details for Spark 10 Pro are limited. Poco F6 Pro benefits from Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for steadier shots and videos.
Video Recording1440p@30fps8K@24fpsPoco F6 Pro offers much higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity.
Fast Charging18W120WPoco F6 Pro offers significantly faster charging speeds, drastically reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Tecno Spark 10 Pro Advantages:

  • Slightly larger display: Offers marginally more screen real estate.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly faster performance: Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior display: AMOLED technology with 120Hz refresh rate delivers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling.
  • Sharper visuals: Higher resolution screen provides greater clarity and detail.
  • Faster charging: 120W fast charging drastically reduces charging time.
  • Better camera features: OIS enables steadier shots and videos, and 8K video recording offers higher resolution.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Poco F6 Pro is significantly more expensive.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Tecno Spark 10 Pro: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media browsing.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance for gaming, content creation, and multitasking, and value a premium display and fast charging. Power users, mobile photographers, and videographers would benefit from the F6 Pro's capabilities.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Spark 10 Pro is a budget-friendly option, while the Poco F6 Pro is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and multimedia consumption.
  3. How important are display quality and performance? The Poco F6 Pro significantly outperforms the Spark 10 Pro in these areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro

While the Tecno Spark 10 Pro offers decent value for its price, the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro is the clear winner for me. The superior performance, stunning AMOLED display with 120Hz, incredibly fast charging, and advanced camera features make it a much more compelling device. While the price difference is substantial, the Poco F6 Pro offers a significant upgrade in almost every aspect of the user experience. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 future-proofs the device for demanding applications and ensures smooth performance for years to come. The investment in the Poco F6 Pro would provide a noticeable and lasting improvement in my daily smartphone usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.