Tecno Spark 10 Pro vs Honor 200 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 22, 2023 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 107.79 cm³ 100.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.41 "/g
Weight 208 g 199 g
Height 168.4 mm 163.3 mm
Width 76.2 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Starry Black
  • Black
  • Pink
  • Moonlight White
  • Ocean Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1224 x 2700
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 437 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 113.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.39 mAh/cm³ 51.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTecno Spark 10 ProHonor 200 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2Honor 200 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)208199Honor 200 Pro is slightly lighter, improving one-handed use.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDOLEDOLED offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.86.78Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 24601224 x 2700Honor 200 Pro has a slightly sharper display.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Honor 200 Pro's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specified4000Honor's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight. Lack of Spark 10 Pro's peak brightness data limits comprehensive comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, enabling smoother multitasking and gaming. 4nm process implies better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz X4 & 4x2.8 GHz A720 & 3x2.0 GHz A520)Honor's CPU architecture is more modern and powerful.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 735Adreno 735 is considerably more powerful, resulting in superior gaming and graphics performance.
RAM (GB)812More RAM in Honor allows for more apps to run in the background without reloading.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution; however, sensor details (size, pixel size) are crucial for image quality and are missing for the Spark 10 Pro.
Video Recording1440p@30fps4K@30fps with OIS, EISHonor 200 Pro offers higher resolution video recording with optical and electronic image stabilization for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005200Slightly larger battery in the Honor 200 Pro.
Fast Charging18W100W + 66W WirelessHonor 200 Pro boasts significantly faster wired and wireless charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Honor 200 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 provides a major leap in processing power for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher quality display: OLED technology with 120Hz refresh rate delivers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother visuals.
  • Faster charging: 100W wired and 66W wireless charging significantly reduce downtime.
  • Better camera capabilities: 4K video recording with OIS/EIS and more detailed sensor specifications suggest superior image and video quality. However, lacking full sensor details for the Spark 10 Pro makes definitive conclusions difficult.

Tecno Spark 10 Pro Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price: Belonging to a "medium price" range while the Honor leans towards the higher end, the Spark 10 Pro is likely more affordable. This requires confirmation with actual pricing.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Tecno Spark 10 Pro: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality (calling, texting, social media) and light gaming.

Honor 200 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, fast charging, and advanced camera features. Suitable for mobile gaming, content creation, and power users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Honor 200 Pro is likely significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the Spark 10 Pro may suffice. For demanding tasks, the Honor 200 Pro is better equipped.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize performance, display, camera, or battery life based on individual needs.

My Choice: Honor 200 Pro

While pricing is a significant factor and the Tecno Spark 10 Pro's price is unknown, the Honor 200 Pro offers a substantial upgrade in nearly every aspect. The superior performance, stunning OLED display with 120Hz, incredibly fast charging, and potentially better camera make it a compelling choice. Even if the price difference is considerable, the long-term value proposition of the Honor 200 Pro, with its future-proof specifications and premium features, outweighs the potential cost savings of the Tecno Spark 10 Pro for my needs. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, high-quality visuals, and quick charging, making the Honor 200 Pro the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.