Tecno Spark 10 5G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 7, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.26 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio N/A 3.49 "/g
Weight 0 g 189 g
Height 164.4 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.5 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 267 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.96 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTecno Spark 10 5GZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.4 x 75.5 x 8.4164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Virtually identical dimensions; negligible real-world difference in size.
Weight (g)0 (Missing data)189Can't compare weight without Spark 10's data. Lighter phones are generally preferred for comfort.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.6Same size; equal screen real estate.
Resolution (px)720 x 1612720 x 1612Identical resolution; same level of detail and sharpness.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzBoth offer decent color reproduction and smooth scrolling with 90Hz refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Dimensity 6020 is built on a smaller node (7nm vs 12nm), suggesting better power efficiency and potentially better performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Spark 10 likely has a performance advantage with faster cores (A76 vs A75) and higher clock speeds. Noticeable in demanding tasks and gaming.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MP1Spark 10's GPU likely performs better due to having more cores (MC2 vs MP1), leading to smoother gaming and graphics rendering.
RAM8GB4GB/8GB (Variant dependent)8GB RAM provides better multitasking and smoother performance compared to 4GB.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPSimilar megapixel count; image quality will depend on sensor and software processing. More details about sensor size and aperture are needed for a thorough comparison.
Selfie Camera8MP8MPSimilar megapixel count; video call and selfie quality will depend on other factors like aperture and software.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer basic video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSame battery capacity; expected similar battery life, though actual usage will vary based on chipset efficiency and software optimization.
Other
NFCNoYesZTE Blade A75 allows for contactless payments and data transfer.
Price RangeMediumLowZTE Blade A75 offers a more budget-friendly option.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Tecno Spark 10 5G Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Dimensity 6020 chipset with faster CPU cores and potentially a more powerful GPU provides a significant performance advantage, especially for gaming and demanding applications.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers faster download and upload speeds in areas with 5G coverage.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lower Price:Positioned in a lower price bracket, offering better value for budget-conscious buyers.
  • NFC Functionality: Enables contactless payments and data transfer, a feature missing in the Spark 10.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: The Spark 10 offers better performance but at a higher price. The Blade A75 compromises on performance for affordability.
  • 5G vs. NFC: The Spark 10 offers 5G but lacks NFC, while the Blade A75 offers NFC but only 4G connectivity.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Tecno Spark 10 5G: Suitable for users who prioritize performance, play demanding mobile games, require fast download speeds (with 5G access), and are willing to pay a bit more.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize value, use their phone for basic tasks (social media, browsing, calls), need NFC for contactless payments, and are not concerned with having the latest connectivity.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Blade A75 is significantly cheaper.
  2. Is 5G connectivity crucial, or is NFC more important? Each phone prioritizes one over the other.
  3. What type of user are you? Heavy users (gaming, multitasking) will benefit from the Spark 10's performance; light users will find the Blade A75 sufficient.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, need contactless payments: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Gamer, needs fast download speeds: Tecno Spark 10 5G
  • Average user, balances price and performance: Consider the RAM variant of the ZTE Blade A75 4G if 8GB is available within budget; otherwise, the Spark 10 if performance is a greater need.

My Choice: Tecno Spark 10 5G

While the missing weight for the Spark 10 and more detailed camera specifications for both phones make a completely informed decision difficult, I would choose the Tecno Spark 10 5G. The superior performance offered by the Dimensity 6020 is a significant advantage for future-proofing and ensuring a smoother user experience in the long run. Access to 5G, while dependent on location availability, provides a significant speed boost over 4G. I personally value performance and faster connectivity over NFC functionality, and I'm willing to pay the slightly higher price for these benefits. However, if budget is a major constraint and NFC is essential, the ZTE Blade A75 4G represents excellent value.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.