Tecno Spark 10 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 7, 2023 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.26 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio N/A 3.51 "/g
Weight 0 g 192 g
Height 164.4 mm 168 mm
Width 75.5 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 267 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.96 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTecno Spark 10 5GXiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.4 x 75.5 x 8.4168 x 78 x 8.1Poco C65 is slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)0 (Missing data)192Cannot compare weight without Spark 10's data.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials unknown for both.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.74Poco C65 offers a slightly larger screen.
Resolution720 x 1612720 x 1600Virtually identical resolution; minimal practical difference.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling thanks to 90Hz refresh rate.
PPI267260Negligible difference in pixel density; sharpness will be similar.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)Dimensity 6020 is built on a more advanced process (7nm vs 12nm), likely resulting in better power efficiency and potentially better performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Spark 10 likely has a performance advantage due to faster clock speeds and newer CPU architecture.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G52 MC2Spark 10 likely has a more powerful GPU, beneficial for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM8GB6/8GB (Variant dependent)8GB RAM on Spark 10 ensures smoother multitasking.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 2MP Macro50MP Main, 2MP Macro, 2MP DepthPoco C65 has a dedicated depth sensor for potentially improved portrait mode. Practical difference may be minimal.
Front Camera8MP8MPSimilar front camera resolution. Image quality will depend on sensor and software processing, which are not fully detailed.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer basic video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, expected battery life will depend on software optimization and chipset efficiency.
Other
NFCNoYesPoco C65 allows for contactless payments and data transfer.
Price RangeMediumLowPoco C65 is positioned as a more budget-friendly option.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Tecno Spark 10 5G Advantages:

  • Potentially better performance: More advanced chipset and CPU architecture suggest smoother operation and better handling of demanding tasks.
  • More power-efficient: 7nm chipset likely translates to longer battery life under similar usage.

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.
  • NFC: Supports contactless payments and data transfer.
  • Slightly Larger Display: Provides marginally more screen real estate.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Tecno Spark 10 5G: Users who prioritize performance and battery life for tasks like gaming, multitasking, and media consumption.

Xiaomi Poco C65: Budget-conscious users who need a large screen and basic smartphone functionality. NFC is a bonus for contactless payments.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco C65 is significantly cheaper.
  2. Is NFC important to you? This is a key differentiator, as the Spark 10 lacks NFC.
  3. Do you prioritize performance or battery life? The Spark 10 likely has an edge in these areas.

My Choice: Tecno Spark 10 5G

While the Poco C65 is appealing for its lower price and NFC, I would choose the Tecno Spark 10 5G. The more efficient 7nm processor, coupled with a likely performance advantage, outweighs the price difference and lack of NFC for me. I value a smooth user experience and potentially longer battery life, particularly when considering the phone's lifespan. The absence of the Spark 10's weight makes a definitive statement on size comparison challenging, but even if slightly heavier, the performance difference remains significant. While NFC is convenient, I can use alternative payment methods. Ultimately, the potential for a better overall user experience due to superior hardware makes the Spark 10 5G the better choice in my opinion.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.