Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs TCL 50 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 50 SE
TCL 50 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date April 4, 2024 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 102.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 198 g 195 g
Height 165.5 mm 168.2 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Comet Green
  • Meteorite Grey
  • Space Gray
  • Midnight Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2436 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.2 % 86 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 550 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 130.52 mAh/in² 108.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 60.3 mAh/cm³ 48.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5010 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTecno Pova 6 ProTCL 50 SEPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.5 x 76.1 x 7.9 mm168.2 x 75.5 x 8.1 mmTecno is slightly smaller and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight198g195gVirtually identical weight.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedUnder-display generally perceived as more modern, side-mounted can be faster and more reliable. Personal preference applies.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzIPS LCD, 90HzPova 6 Pro will have richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED. 120Hz offers smoother animations and scrolling compared to 90Hz on the TCL.
Size6.78"6.78"Identical screen size.
Resolution1080 x 24361080 x 2460Negligible difference in sharpness.
Peak Brightness1300 nitsNot specifiedPova's significantly higher brightness ensures better outdoor visibility. Lack of data for TCL 50 SE limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm)Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Dimensity 6080, built on a smaller process node, offers significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to the Helio G88.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Pova 6 Pro has faster clock speeds and more powerful cores, resulting in smoother multitasking and better performance in demanding applications.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G52 MC2Pova 6 Pro's GPU is more powerful, delivering better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM12GB6GBDouble the RAM on the Pova 6 Pro allows for significantly better multitasking and less frequent app reloading.
Storage256GB256GBIdentical storage capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fpsPova 6 Pro offers higher resolution video recording (1440p) and a higher frame rate option (60fps) for smoother videos. Lack of detailed camera specs limits further comparison.
Battery
Capacity6000 mAh5010 mAhPova 6 Pro offers a larger battery capacity, potentially translating to longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Tecno Pova 6 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: Dimensity 6080 chipset, more RAM, and a superior GPU offer a smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate delivers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, smoother scrolling, and improved power efficiency. Higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.

TCL 50 SE Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While both are in the "medium price" range, the TCL 50 SE might be more budget-friendly due to its less powerful specifications.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: The Pova 6 Pro offers significantly better performance but likely at a higher price point. The TCL 50 SE might be a better value for budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability over top-tier performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Tecno Pova 6 Pro: Users who prioritize performance, a smooth and vibrant display, long battery life, and modern features like an under-display fingerprint sensor. Ideal for mobile gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

TCL 50 SE: Users on a tight budget who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, web browsing, and social media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Pova 6 Pro likely commands a higher price for its superior performance.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For demanding tasks like gaming or heavy multitasking, the Pova 6 Pro is a better choice. For basic usage, the TCL 50 SE might suffice.
  3. How important is display quality and smoothness? The Pova 6 Pro's AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate provides a significant advantage in visual experience.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Tecno Pova 6 Pro for its powerful processor and smoother display.
  • Budget-conscious user: TCL 50 SE if basic functionality is the priority.
  • Power user: Tecno Pova 6 Pro for its performance, RAM, and battery.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.