Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Google Pixel 8a - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 4, 2024 May 14, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 99.5 cm³ 98.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.24 "/g
Weight 198 g 188 g
Height 165.5 mm 152.1 mm
Width 76.1 mm 72.7 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Comet Green
  • Meteorite Grey
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Bay
  • Aloe

Display

Screen Size 6.78 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1080 x 2436 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.2 % 81.2 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 430 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1300 nits 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 130.52 mAh/in² 120.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 60.3 mAh/cm³ 45.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 4492 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Immortalis-G715s MC10

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs. Google Pixel 8a: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTecno Pova 6 ProGoogle Pixel 8aPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.5 x 76.1 x 7.9 mm152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9 mmPixel 8a is noticeably smaller and might be more comfortable for one-handed use. Pova 6 Pro is larger, potentially less pocketable.
Weight198g188gPova 6 Pro is slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal in practical use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Size6.78"6.1"Pova 6 Pro offers a significantly larger screen for more immersive media consumption. Pixel 8a is more compact.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzOLED, HDR, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to 120Hz. HDR on Pixel 8a provides better contrast and color accuracy in supported content.
Resolution1080 x 24361080 x 2400Virtually identical sharpness due to similar pixel density.
Peak Brightness1300 nits2000 nitsPixel 8a's screen will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm)Google Tensor G3 (4nm)Tensor G3, built on a smaller process node, is likely more power efficient and offers superior performance, especially in AI tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)Tensor G3's more modern architecture with a powerful Cortex-X3 core should result in significantly faster performance in demanding tasks and better multitasking.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Immortalis-G715s MC10Pixel 8a will have significantly better gaming performance and handle graphically intensive tasks more smoothly.
RAM12GB8GBPova 6 Pro's larger RAM might offer slightly better multitasking, but the Tensor G3's efficiency could offset this difference.
Storage256GB256GBBoth offer the same storage capacity.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare camera quality without detailed sensor and lens specifications.
Video1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps (OIS), 1080p@30/60/120/240fps (OIS)Pixel 8a offers superior video recording capabilities with 4K resolution, higher frame rates, and Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity6000 mAh4492 mAhPova 6 Pro offers significantly longer battery life.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds without specific data.
Software
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run the latest Android version.
OS UpdatesNot specifiedUp to Android 21Pixel 8a will receive significantly longer software updates and security patches directly from Google.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Tecno Pova 6 Pro Advantages:

  • Larger Display: More immersive for media consumption.
  • Larger Battery: Significantly longer battery life.
  • More RAM: Potentially smoother multitasking.

Google Pixel 8a Advantages:

  • Significantly Faster Performance: Due to the more powerful Tensor G3 chip.
  • Better Display Quality: HDR support and higher peak brightness.
  • Superior Video Recording: 4K resolution, higher frame rates, and OIS.
  • Smaller and Lighter: Easier to handle and carry.
  • Guaranteed Software Updates: Longer support and security updates.

Trade-offs:

  • Pova 6 Pro: Larger battery and display come at the cost of size and weight. Performance significantly lags behind the Pixel 8a.
  • Pixel 8a: Smaller battery capacity compared to Pova 6 Pro.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Tecno Pova 6 Pro: Ideal for users prioritizing battery life and a large screen for media consumption on a budget. Suitable for users who are not heavy gamers or require the latest features.

Google Pixel 8a: Ideal for users who value performance, camera quality, a compact form factor, and timely software updates. Best suited for power users, gamers, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both are mid-range, but actual pricing might vary.
  2. What is your primary use case? (e.g., media consumption, gaming, photography)
  3. How important are software updates and long-term support?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy media consumer on a budget: Tecno Pova 6 Pro.
  • Gamer or power user: Google Pixel 8a.
  • User prioritizing long-term software support and compact size: Google Pixel 8a.
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.