TCL 40 SE vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 40 SE
TCL 40 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date April 4, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 109.18 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.55 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 190 g 189 g
Height 167.9 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.5 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Dark grey
  • Twilight purple
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.75 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 109.96 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.89 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5010 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureTCL 40 SEZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6ZTE is slightly smaller and may feel more comfortable in hand. Differences are minimal.
Weight (g)190189Negligible weight difference.
Display
Size (inches)6.756.6TCL offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1612Virtually identical resolution; sharpness will be similar on both devices.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDExpect similar color accuracy and viewing angles. TCL specifies 450 nits typical brightness, while ZTE does not provide this data. Higher nits generally translate to better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37Unisoc T606Unisoc T606 generally benchmarks higher in CPU performance due to its Cortex-A75 cores. Expect smoother multitasking and potentially better performance in demanding apps on the ZTE.
CPU4x2.3 GHz + 4x1.8 GHz2x1.6 GHz + 6x1.6 GHzSee Chipset.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 generally offers better gaming performance than the PowerVR GE8320.
RAM (GB)4 (Listed)8 (Listed)ZTE offers significantly more RAM in the listed variant, resulting in much better multitasking and app switching performance. TCL has other variants but RAM wasn't specified for comparison.
Camera
Rear50MP + 2MP + 2MP50MP + 0.3MPBoth have a 50MP main sensor, but the secondary lenses on the TCL offer more practical utility (depth and macro) compared to the ZTE's largely useless 0.3MP sensor.
Selfie8MP8MPSimilar selfie camera resolution.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50105000Negligible difference in battery capacity.
Fast Charging18W22.5WZTE offers faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

TCL 40 SE Advantages:

  • Slightly Larger Display: Offers a more immersive experience for media consumption.
  • More Versatile Camera System: The triple camera setup with depth and macro lenses provides more practical photography options.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Unisoc T606 chipset and notably higher RAM in the compared variant provide a smoother and faster user experience, especially for multitasking and demanding applications.
  • Faster Charging: Reduces downtime.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

TCL 40 SE: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display for media consumption and casual photography. Suitable for:

  • Casual Social Media Users: Large screen enhances the experience.
  • Light Gamers: Basic games will run, but performance will be limited.
  • Media Consumers: Enjoy videos and movies on the larger display.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Users who prioritize performance and speed on a budget. Suitable for:

  • Multitaskers: Ample RAM handles switching between apps efficiently.
  • Mobile Gamers: Better GPU performance for a smoother gaming experience.
  • Users of Demanding Apps: Faster CPU ensures smoother operation of complex applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both are budget phones, but price differences may exist.
  2. What is your primary use case? (e.g., media consumption, gaming, multitasking)
  3. How important is camera versatility?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Use: Either phone is suitable.
  • Prioritize Performance: ZTE Blade A75 4G.
  • Large Screen for Media: TCL 40 SE.
  • Mobile Gaming: ZTE Blade A75 4G.

My Choice: ZTE Blade A75 4G

While the TCL 40 SE offers a slightly larger display and a more versatile camera system, the ZTE Blade A75 4G's significantly superior performance due to its more powerful chipset and larger RAM (in the compared 8GB variant) is the deciding factor for me. A smooth user experience is paramount, and the ZTE is more likely to provide that, especially in the long run. The faster charging is a welcome bonus. The marginal benefits of the TCL 40 SE do not outweigh the performance advantage of the ZTE Blade A75 4G. While screen size preference is subjective, the performance difference will impact daily usage more significantly for most users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.